cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Want the oppurtunity to discuss enhancements to PTC products? Join a working group! X

Save a copy of part but reference orignal part

ptc-5471878
7-Bedrock

Save a copy of part but reference orignal part

I have 3 similar parts to design. So I decided to make one part that has features that all three parts share. Now I want to be able to copy this base part 3 times and start adding features unique to each of the three parts. The issue I am having a problem with is I also want those 3 copied parts to reference the base part. So if I change a feature in the base part then my 3 unique parts will also update.

How do I copy the base part 3 times and have those copies reference the original part?


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.
ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

You want to look into Merge/Inheritance. You'd have the parent part and then pass the features to the 3 parts by using Insert, Shared Data, Merge/Inheritance.

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4

You want to look into Merge/Inheritance. You'd have the parent part and then pass the features to the 3 parts by using Insert, Shared Data, Merge/Inheritance.

...or learn more about family tables. This allows you to make unique parts within one file if they enough alike to manage it this way.

Dale_Rosema
23-Emerald III
(To:TomD.inPDX)

How unique are the 3 parts from each other. If you have a lot of differences, I probably would not go with family tables (and I use them frequently). If they are fairly similar with only a few differences, then that would be a good option and the "generic" would be a hodge podge of all the feature on the part and you just turn on/off the features in the family table.

Thanks, Dale

Thanks for the help everyone. I've done a little be with family tables and the parts are not that different from each other so I will probably go that route. Going to take a look at the merge/inheritance first though.

Thanks Again!

Announcements
NEW Creo+ Topics: Real-time Collaboration


Top Tags