Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page

Jan 14, 2019
05:18 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator

Jan 14, 2019
05:18 AM

Definite 4D integral evaluation (Fuchs-Sondheimer Resistivity model for Nanowires)

Hello,

I really appreciate it if someone can help me to double check the following equation by running my sheet in their Mathcad. I attached my sheet.

This time, I use different formula from my previous post here.

In the mean time, I am writing matlab code to double check as well.

I run my sheet, it took so much time with my pc and at the end it show error.

The formula to compute:

Solved! Go to Solution.

Labels:

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Jan 15, 2019
04:42 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator

Jan 15, 2019
04:42 PM

And YES, there are ways to speed it up.

This is the time to calculate 6 points on my pc:

If you notice that the integrand function to dTheta is symmetric around pi/2, we can omit half of the integration:

Down from 203 to 92 seconds.

Success!

Luc

8 REPLIES 8

Jan 14, 2019
11:41 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator

Jan 14, 2019
11:41 AM

Hi,

You need to be very patient for a result

Jan 14, 2019
11:43 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator

Jan 14, 2019
11:43 AM

Hi

Jan 15, 2019
01:42 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator

Jan 15, 2019
01:42 AM

@terryhendicott

hi...thank you.

could you run it once again from w: 20-70 nm?

The motivation is to see the w around lambda and thickness h.

I tried in my pc from w: 25 - 50 nm. it still takes long time.

is there tips to speed up the calculation?

I use ORIGIN=0, TOL=10^-3, CTOL=10^-3

@LucMeekes

Hi..yes, the integral notation confused me.

But after reading the very original paper, which use such a notation, nested integration is my conclusion.

In your sheet, your third term uses +, it should be -.

You might got that from the paper, which shows double minus sign.

Thank again for your help.

Jan 15, 2019
09:53 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator

Jan 15, 2019
09:53 AM

Hi,

Cheers Terry

Jan 15, 2019
04:09 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator

Jan 15, 2019
04:09 PM

The third term is negative, due to the -6 that it starts with. If used the expression continuation (continues the expression from the previous line). In Mathcad that is only possible with an addition, so I just add a negative expression...

Luc

Jan 15, 2019
04:42 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator

Jan 15, 2019
04:42 PM

And YES, there are ways to speed it up.

This is the time to calculate 6 points on my pc:

If you notice that the integrand function to dTheta is symmetric around pi/2, we can omit half of the integration:

Down from 203 to 92 seconds.

Success!

Luc

Jan 15, 2019
01:51 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator

Jan 15, 2019
01:51 AM

deleted

Jan 14, 2019
04:30 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator

Jan 14, 2019
04:30 PM

Assuming that weird integral notation actually is intended to mean the nested integrals below:...

Success!

Luc

P.S. It also means that the expression in your other thread was actually meant to be a nested integral, rather than a product of integration results. That other expression easily runs into overflows when trying to (numerically) integrate. No symbolic solution was found.