Hello, World! See my 1-st Prime Animation!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
- Labels:
-
Other
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
From one static position (3 mass on strings) to second one (3 masses on springs:
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
But I do not understand - where is here an error.
pe - Potential energy
ke - Kinetic energy
se - Energy of springers
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi Valery,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Units, Units and one more Units!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
I have converted the sheet into Prime.
Prime works with units by the Odesolve function and points me the bug!
But Prime has not an animation!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Correct units
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
For physics
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
With friction - energy dissipation
(16 DEs)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
...let's end it like this:
Anyway: I'm missing Equations derived from a dynamic balance in accordance with your outstanding simulation.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
ValeryOchkov написал(а):
Fine too
Похоже ли это на улыбку, на улыбку женщины? Мы уже получали тюльпан!
Does this sound like a smile, the smile of a woman? We received Tulip!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Valery,
I need help for better understanding according to your summation of Forces of pendulum-3-hard-linking.mcdx.
I created a dynamic balance, which you can see in the sketch.
The direction of force of the slowness is allways in the opposite direction of the acceleration vektor (D' Lambert's Law)
I confirm with your equations in x-direction, but in y-direction we have different equations.
The body mass m1 moves to the left in direction of the negative x-achses and it moves downwards in direction to the negative y-achses.
So the body mass m1 accelerates (increasing speed) downwards and to the left.
I am confused if i compare my equations with yours.
How did you get it, can you show me with a short sketch?
Can you please tell me what is fact here?
Thank you!
Volker
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Sorry, Volker!
I input equations and see an animation.
If the animation is fine - equations are correct.
If the animation is not fine - I change equations and see new animation!
And I think about physic of course. But in second line
Main is a fine animation!
We have animation in Mathcad 15 but cannot work with units in Odesolve.
We can work with units in Odesolve in Prime, but Prime have not animation!
Нет в жизни счастья!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Volker Lehner написал(а):
Valery,
I need help for better understanding according to your summation of Forces of pendulum-3-hard-linking.mcdx.
I created a dynamic balance, which you can see in the sketch.
The direction of force of the slowness is allways in the opposite direction of the acceleration vektor (D' Lambert's Law)
I confirm with your equations in x-direction, but in y-direction we have different equations.
The body mass m1 moves to the left in direction of the negative x-achses and it moves downwards in direction to the negative y-achses.
So the body mass m1 accelerates (increasing speed) downwards and to the left.
I am confused if i compare my equations with yours.
How did you get it, can you show me with a short sketch?
Can you please tell me what is fact here?
Thank you!
Volker
I have change in my model one minus to plus and see an error in the animation: the point 2 must go down not up! And forces values are not correct!
At FRAME=4 and more I got - no solution.
When minus is returned - all is correct - the point 2 goes down! And we can change FRAME value 7, 8, 8 etc and see future animation's frames!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Great stuff Val!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Toby Metcalf написал(а):
Great stuff Val!
Thanks, Toby!
I hope the article will be interesting.
I would like to translate it in English and publish.
Can you help me?
Val
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
My Russian is a bit rusty Val 🙂
How long is the article?
Best,
Toby
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi Toby,
it's about 29 Pages.
It's allways very interresting, how the comunity solves problems and brings many Ideas to solve them.
Best, Volker
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Volker Lehner написал(а):
Hi Toby,
it's about 29 Pages.
It's allways very interresting, how the comunity solves problems and brings many Ideas to solve them.
Best, Volker
Many Soviet jokes began this way: "Russian, German and American somehow got together and began to solve one problem..."
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Toby Metcalf написал(а):
My Russian is a bit rusty Val 🙂
Google Translator + Toby = Success!
Toby Metcalf написал(а):
How long is the article?
See please the attach!
Try please the part 1, but better 1, 2 and 3
I hope you will someone know new about Mathcad and about work with it!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
I would be using Google Translate - not sure if that is the best method
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Thanks, Toby!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
The variant of the article from 12/05/2017 (with a divertissement) in attach
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Very nice!
I'm missing that womans in your....
and
You still owe me an answer in this matter:
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Last variant of the article (2017/6/6) with AntiAnimation
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Editorial board of one authoritative joutal reviewed the article and recommended its publication in one collection of articles.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi, Volker!
Check please the last page (with english text) of our article in attach.
Val
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi Valery,
Perfect!
Volker
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Valery,
Please change my Adress in the Article to:
**«Mechanical Engineering Office»
Eschenweg 4, 71576 Burgstetten, Germany
Now I'm a self made man
Thank you!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi Valery,
maybe some links in the Article could make problems.
When executing some links at the artikels text passage it's leading to an error but after confirm them, the link will open the website.
Is it because of the new Forum we have now?
Volker
