On 10/25/2009 4:38:09 PM, stuartafbruff wrote:
>On 10/25/2009 2:16:27 PM, Tom_Gutman
>wrote:
>== There is no need to go to the trouble
>of
>converting the nested vector that you
>originally
>create to a matrix. The nested vector
>can be used
>directly, and is more flexible.
>
>It's also a good subject for cat
>skinning .. not so
>much because the other ways are more
>efficient but
>simply to play around with different
>ways of
>operating on the data.
>
>Stuart
_____________________________________
Simply that Tom didn't complete the project. Your XX(1542) is so messy and goes nowhere to interest either a Mathcader or an ordinary reader.
jmG