cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Learn all about PTC Community Badges. Engage with PTC and see how many you can earn! X

Translate the entire conversation x

Mathcad usage

NM_10165576
13-Aquamarine

Mathcad usage

Hello everyone,
eff.K shown in picture is radius of curvature along beam length and X is the array for sectional points.
I have to double integrate eff.K to get deflection. How can i do it in Mathcad? Attached Mathcad 10 sheet.

NM_10165576_1-1749709475403.png

 

 

ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Hi,

See enclosed file.

Capture.JPG

View solution in original post

11 REPLIES 11

Hi,

two steps.

1) turn the effK into a continuous function using the interp() function.

2) make a function to do the double integration.

Capture.JPG

Then plot the result

Capture2.JPG

Terry, shouldn't your outer integration be with respect to x?

Hi Alan,

If the second integral is wrt x it would be an area integration.  It should be two integrals wrt length along the beam?

To be meaningful for deflection of the beam the slope at the ends of the beam needs to be included?

Cheers

Terry

I have no expertise whatsoever in your field of work but the double integral as you had set it up

Werner_E_0-1749736087219.png

would mean that the evaluation of the inner definite integral would yield an expression in x. Variable y is gone and the subsequent integration wrt y would mean just a multiplication by y.

Given the limits 0 to x of the outer integral this would mean that you could replace the outer integration just by a multiplication with x.

So we could spare the outer integral speeding up the calculations. But is this really as it should be???

Here are is your formula and the equivalent one (with just the multiplication by x) compared with Alan's suggestion, which sure looks more like a parabola:

Werner_E_3-1749737244250.png

 

I have no knowledge about beams and deflection but I also guessed that either the variable of integration of the outer integral should not be y and/or that one of the integral limits should be different.

 

PS: While mathematically not correct in notation, the following would yield the very same result as my delta3 above and is maybe what you had in mind?:

Werner_E_4-1749737382912.png

 

Thank you.
please send me the mathcad file.

Thank you for the answer. 
But the curve doesn't look like a beam deflected shape for simply supported beam. Shouldn't it be like parabola?

Hi,

But the curve doesn't look like a beam deflected shape for simply supported beam. Shouldn't it be like parabola?

Correct.  Allowance needs to be made for the slope of the simply supported beam at the supports.  Not enough information is given in the post to calculate this.

Cheers

Terry

beam length is 5.46m and the supports are at 0.1m from left and 0.1m from right. Calculate for this new data, if possible.Deflected curve looks like in the image below. Attached the mathcad sheet.

NM_10165576_2-1749724661460.png

 

NM_10165576_0-1749724065667.png

NM_10165576_1-1749724145244.png

 

 

Hi,

See enclosed file.

Capture.JPG

This works. Thank you😊

Here's a simple numerical integration:

NumericalInt.png

 

 

Announcements


Top Tags