Thanks Richard, so far I understood hyperthreading, the question however is how Mathcad Prime is built to make use of the hyperthreading capabilities of the hardware we are using.
As far as I know, Mathcad works through its worksheet from left to right and from top to bottom. I also tend to split up my applications into GUI-sheets and the formulae which are located in worksheets that are referenced.
In these formulae I use a lot of functions and not many intermediate results, that has its consequences in terms of memory management. So I would guess that before calculating, Mathcad Prime screens and breaks down the statements in the worksheet and divides the work over different threads. The thing is whether the old way of working - which is quite straightforward in my humble opinion - still is better in terms of calculation speed or not. All functions reside in RAM, so when I call a function in the GUI worksheet, Mathcad then should recalculate the result over different threads, right?
I'm not sure whether Mathcad Prime indeed does a screening or not. Therefore I would like to know what PTC envisioned while developing Prime to use hyperthreading and how I can write worksheets that make maximum use of this hyperthreading in order to maximize performance. Does the user have such an influence?? Again, I'm just guessing here.
In other words, what does Mathcad do with hyperthreading and how can we influence/measure that in terms of performance?
