Negative inverse transposed matrix
Jan 05, 2010
03:00 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Jan 05, 2010
03:00 AM
Negative inverse transposed matrix
I have a text book example I can't translate into Mathcad.
They provide a 2x2 matrix as follows:
1 0.051
0.051 1
They then say to transform it by "transpose of the inverse of the square root" of the above matrix.
They use notation that is M followed by a superscript of -1/2
(M^-(1/2))`
The result should be:
1 -0.03
-0.03 1
I don't know how to square root a matrix, and square root of individual values doesn't provide the "correct" answer.
Any ideas?
Thank you.
Philip
___________________
Nobody can hear you scream in Euclidean space.
They provide a 2x2 matrix as follows:
1 0.051
0.051 1
They then say to transform it by "transpose of the inverse of the square root" of the above matrix.
They use notation that is M followed by a superscript of -1/2
(M^-(1/2))`
The result should be:
1 -0.03
-0.03 1
I don't know how to square root a matrix, and square root of individual values doesn't provide the "correct" answer.
Any ideas?
Thank you.
Philip
___________________
Nobody can hear you scream in Euclidean space.
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Algebra_Geometry
6 REPLIES 6
Jan 05, 2010
03:00 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Jan 05, 2010
03:00 AM
Use eigenvalues for generalize functions definitions from complex to matrix domain.
Regards. Alvaro.
Regards. Alvaro.
Jan 05, 2010
03:00 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Jan 05, 2010
03:00 AM
Thanks. That worked perfectly.
I wouldn't have been able to work that one out.
I'm using it to find the canonical coefficients of a canonical correlation. I can then use these correlation coefficients as part of a descriminant function analysis.
The book I have skims over the calculations because it assumes you just plug the figures into SPSS and get the answer.
Philip
___________________
Nobody can hear you scream in Euclidean space.
I wouldn't have been able to work that one out.
I'm using it to find the canonical coefficients of a canonical correlation. I can then use these correlation coefficients as part of a descriminant function analysis.
The book I have skims over the calculations because it assumes you just plug the figures into SPSS and get the answer.
Philip
___________________
Nobody can hear you scream in Euclidean space.
Jan 05, 2010
03:00 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Jan 05, 2010
03:00 AM
You could also use a Given ... Find solve block if you want to avoid using eigenvalues/vectors - see attached.
stv
stv
Jan 05, 2010
03:00 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Jan 05, 2010
03:00 AM
On 1/5/2010 9:20:26 AM, stv wrote:
== You could also use a Given ... Find solve block if you want to avoid using eigenvalues/vectors
Or the Denman-Beavers algorithm ...
Stuart
== You could also use a Given ... Find solve block if you want to avoid using eigenvalues/vectors
Or the Denman-Beavers algorithm ...
Stuart
Jan 05, 2010
03:00 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Jan 05, 2010
03:00 AM
Thanks for the various options.
Philip
___________________
Nobody can hear you scream in Euclidean space.
Philip
___________________
Nobody can hear you scream in Euclidean space.
Jan 10, 2010
03:00 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Jan 10, 2010
03:00 AM
Maths-matix aren't always "true" and clear cut.
Book notation make them worst.
Your example seems to come out indirectly from:

jmG
Book notation make them worst.
Your example seems to come out indirectly from:

jmG
