In Mathcad 15, if I want to convert a non-integer range variable to a vector, I can use several techniques, including this:
However, in Prime 3.1 all I get is this:
I want to complain!
Stuart
I want to complain!
Responsive as PTC usually is, you sure will get feedback and a solution very soon.
Let them please a little bit of time, because they just have to first implement MDAs and a few other odds and ends. 
Seems like the internal loops are now implemented differently.
Some other of the old and dirty tricks still work, like the assignment with in-line evaluation:
Werner
Werner Exinger wrote:
I want to complain!
Responsive as PTC usually is, you sure will get feedback and a solution very soon.
Let them please a little bit of time, because they just have to first implement MDAs and a few other odds and ends.
Seems like the internal loops are now implemented differently.
Some other of the old and dirty tricks still work, like the assignment with in-line evaluation:
Werner
I'm not normally paranoid, but I'm beginning to think they do these things just to annoy me. 
Stuart
I'm not normally paranoid, but I'm beginning to think they do these things just to annoy me.
You are not paranoid. They do
Richard Jackson wrote:
I'm not normally paranoid, but I'm beginning to think they do these things just to annoy me.
You are not paranoid. They do
Thank goodness for that! I thought I was going crazy. 
This at least still works:
You do have to define the range variable though, because it won't let you pass a range value as an argument (why?).
Richard Jackson wrote:
This at least still works:
As does my vec function ... thankfully,
You do have to define the range variable though, because it won't let you pass a range value as an argument (why?).
Tell me about it, already. 
I pointed this out years ago ... Re: Convert Nested Array to Matrix
Stuart
LucMeekes wrote:
So they've implemented the behaviour of good-old Mcad 11:
into Prime 3.1:
Luc
I do hope the loss of recursive local functions in Prime isn't a step towards the "good-old M11 behaviour" of *no* local functions! 
Stuart
