Community Tip - If community subscription notifications are filling up your inbox you can set up a daily digest and get all your notifications in a single email. X
Hello, Everybody.
Thank you in advance for your time and help.
Regards.
Thank you in advance for your time and help.
Help with what??
You are using the Gamma function as defined by Legendre (Usually Euler is credited correctly but he suggested a slighty different definition) but you seem to have no idea what this function is all about or what it looks like! So why do you use it???
I suggest you study the literature to get an idea about this meromoprh function over C and then you probably will understand why Mathcad can't evaluate that function for zero or negative integer arguments. You may even plot the Gamma function in Mathcad to get an idea. (Hints: Points of discontinuity, vertical asymptotes)
And when you are at it you may also give the definition of factorials a close look as the next error in your expression is the use of factorials of negative integers.
Many thanks for your response, Werner. And :
It seems I'm missing something ?
Thanks once again.
Regards.
It seems I'm missing something ?
Yes - math knowledge!
Whether you are learning math or you are doing some serious work, in any case you should stick to some reliable, reputable literature rather than to blindly trust a computer software!
Hello, again.
Thank you in advance.
Regards.
I am confused!
You seem to know the solution, so what is the purpose of the question?
Just to see if Mathcad is capable of doing it? You saw that it is not and you have been told over and over again that Mathcad is not the right tool for that kind of calculations which you are trying to do all the time (whatever that may be anyway).
So again - Mathcad is not the right tool! It gets even worse if you partially simplify it manually and replace the inner sum by its equivalent closed expression and then tell Mathcad's symbolic to evaluate it. So if you want some fun, her you are:
Simply replacing the expression (-1)^j by the equivalent cos(pi*j) gives you the result you expected
And whats the benefit? To what extent will this help you now?