cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Have a PTC product question you need answered fast? Chances are someone has asked it before. Learn about the community search. X

System Monitor - socketRead0

jkent
12-Amethyst

System Monitor - socketRead0

On most of my transactions in the PTC System Monitor I always see socketRead0(FileDescriptor, byte[], int, int, int) as being the highest execution time.

Anyone have some insight in to what is causing the high execution time? Not sure where to start to track it down.

screenshot.png

5 REPLIES 5

Hey man, I am a huge fan of PSM and I see that all the time. Here is the explanation I believe:

http://javaeesupportpatterns.blogspot.com/2011/08/javanetsocketinputstreamsocketread0.html

Hope it helps!

jkent
12-Amethyst
(To:Andrewdelk)

Thanks Andy. That looks to be the exact issue. Have you opened calls with PTC support on this? Did they come back with any resolution for you?

Gotta be honest with you, I sure haven't. I see it often and have been curious but I am sure you can relate when I say that I have time only to open tickets for the broken stuff right now in preparation for PTCPlanet.

This makes a lot of sense and my Dev team confirmed that it is legit. That's good enough for me

jessh
12-Amethyst
(To:jkent)

Looking at the caller breakdown it seems clear that the socketRead0's in question are JDBC calls waiting on responses from SQL Server. Thus the better question may be why your SQL Server is so slow to respond.

jkent
12-Amethyst
(To:jessh)

Here is an Add To Workspace that took 32.99 seconds. Of that 32.99 seconds 22.95 was spent in the method server and 10.04 was spent in SQL Server.

screenshot.png

Announcements


Top Tags