cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Your Friends List is a way to easily have access to the community members that you interact with the most! X

Hello, World! See my 1-st Prime Animation!

ValeryOchkov
24-Ruby IV

Hello, World! See my 1-st Prime Animation!

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

106 REPLIES 106
vlehner
13-Aquamarine
(To:ValeryOchkov)

Amazing Valery!

is it possible to run the animation in Prime like running animations via range variable in MC15?

Volker

Volker Lehner написал(а):

Amazing Valery!

Thanks!

Volker Lehner написал(а):

is it possible to run the animation in Prime like running animations via range variable in MC15?

We use the variable FRAME in Mathcad 15 not range variable!

But is the model correct?

Must forces F1, F2 and F3 be always negative?

See please re attach!

vlehner
13-Aquamarine
(To:ValeryOchkov)

I'd say Yes!

I changed some initial Values and then forces became also positiv and negative.

How are you doing that the mass-points make lines in the diagram?
Is it a Vektor?
couldn't figure out it.
Volker

Sorry, by my ICs we have one positive force at t=1.8 s

FFF.png

FFF-t.png

I think the model is correct. Or?

vlehner
13-Aquamarine
(To:ValeryOchkov)

Valery,

my physical understanding would say yes.

And the sum of all energies seems to be constant (Apart from the peaks in the diagram...)

But the peaks could be an inaccuracy in the calculation process of the simulation.

The amount of the maximum deviation in the diagram is only about 0.02 joules

acting Forces at:

and

are this:

at the time of 1.8s i got this result:

nearly constant energy of 0 Joules and a positive force F3.

What do you want more-I think it's ok with all.

regards Volker

ps.: please help me with a simple example to plot traces in a diagram like a mass point does make in your sheet.

Volker

I think it is an unstable numerical solution an t >1.8 s

See one my old animation with 4 pendulums at FRAME>400

Video Link : 1970

vlehner
13-Aquamarine
(To:ValeryOchkov)

That looks cool!

especially th moving tracks.

Volker

>What do you want more-I think it's ok with all.

I am preparing an article and would like to see you and Fred as coauthors! OK?

vlehner
13-Aquamarine
(To:ValeryOchkov)

>I am preparing an article and would like to see you and Fred as coauthors! OK?<

Thank you Valery!

That's an honor for me an i appreciate it.

Volker

ok! I I will send the draft of the article tomorrow!

At first in Russian and than or parallel in English!

Sorry, in German too?

vlehner
13-Aquamarine
(To:ValeryOchkov)

If it doesn't make too much effort, ok in german but it's not a must.

Thank you again Valery!

Я также хотел бы помочь

Volker

See please the first version of the article in attach

I am waiting for your remarks, adds, etc

Бог в помощь!

>ps.: please help me with a simple example to plot traces in a diagram like a mass point does make in your sheet.

Ich bin froh zu helfen. Give please more information!

The string must break in this moment

FFF-t-max.png

vlehner
13-Aquamarine
(To:ValeryOchkov)

no it doesn't.

These are only about -18.41 Newtons 😉

Volker
vlehner
13-Aquamarine
(To:ValeryOchkov)

Valery,

What are the Forces F1, F2, F3 exactly?

Are these the Forces which have the same direction like the strings (=colinear)?

I try to verify the acting forces again  to be sure if all be allright.

Volker

>Are these the Forces which have the same direction like the strings (=colinear)?

Yes!

F<0 - Stretching of the string

F>0 - Compression - not possible with a string (see at t= 1.8 s). Check please!

Fig-17-FFF.png

vlehner
13-Aquamarine
(To:ValeryOchkov)

>F>0 - Compression - not possible with a string (see at t= 1.8 s). Check please!<

With an ammount of 0.008 Newton- it's a inaccuracy of calculation in my opinion.

In that moment, we would have a free falling body.

We should do an experiment, and see what the string does make at the force>0. (needing a high speed camera)

If the strings are stiff (we didn't take into account at the beginning of our simulation) what would then happen?

I want to try to setup a calculation with Lagrangesche Formulas, but it's a hard way to do.
Volker

We can describe all this in the article!

> it's a inaccuracy of calculation in my opinion.

I think  this picture can tell us some thing about accuracy:

Fig-18-energy-1.png

>I want to try to setup a calculation with Lagrange's Formulas, but it's a hard way to do.

From one my book:

Тут нужно вспомнить об инерциальных и неинерциальных системах отсчета, не только о ньютоновской, но и о лагранжевой и гамильтоновой механике, а также о других тонкостях раздела физики под названием динамика. Впрочем, наш вопрос о том, какая кривая на рис. 9.37 более правильная, сам посебе не со  всем корректен. В настоящее время, почти все физические журналы не принимают к рассмотрению не только статьи с описанием вечных двигателей, но и статьи по небесной механике с опорой на ньютоновскую механику. Но наша книга не о механике, а о том, как старые не очень сложные задачи решать с помощью современных компьютерных средств.

A google translation - correct please!

Here we need to recall inertial and non-inertial frames of reference, not only Newtonian, but also Lagrange and Hamiltonian mechanics, as well as other subtleties of the physics section called dynamics. However, our question about which curve in Fig. 9.37 is more correct, not by itself? Everything is correct. At the present time, almost all physical journals do not take into consideration not only articles describing perpetual motion machines, but also articles on celestial mechanics with reliance on Newtonian mechanics. But our book is not about mechanics, but about how to solve old, not very difficult tasks with the help of modern computer tools.

vlehner
13-Aquamarine
(To:ValeryOchkov)

Hello Valery,

acting forces seems to be ok for me.

preparing the Lagrangesche for three Variables (phi 1, phi 2 and phi 3 as generalized koordinates for the systen)

...stay tuned...

Volker

Volker

Last version of the article in attach!

"Наши цели ясны! Задачи определены! За работу, товарищи!" (Н.С. Хрущев)

One more picture for thinking

Fig-18-vvv.png

vlehner
13-Aquamarine
(To:ValeryOchkov)

What the pendulum with 3 masses is concerned: Lagrangesche Formulas - I cannot handle the huge equations with Mathcad Prime solve block.

The better way is to use mechanical Formulas (Newton's Laws) like Valery did.

I made the Lagrangesche for a pendulum with 2 masses and it works perfect.

And now i plottet my first trajektory with Prime in the attached example. Wohuuuuu!!!!!

Valery: pleas tell me the internet programm that i can visualize a moving pendulum trajektory.

Volker

Volker Lehner написал(а):

Valery: pleas tell me the internet programm that i can visualize a moving pendulum trajektory.

https://ru.toolson.net/GifAnimation/Create

vlehner
13-Aquamarine
(To:ValeryOchkov)

THX!

Volker

Sorry,

I cannot open your files in Prime 4.0

Top Tags