cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Want the oppurtunity to discuss enhancements to PTC products? Join a working group! X

Edit Definition does not work in a Pattern within an Assembly

Greg_H
11-Garnet

Edit Definition does not work in a Pattern within an Assembly

Just wondering if anyone else has run into this?

 

Typically I can change the constraints of a component in a pattern by clicking on the Edit Definition of the 1st instance.  I have one assembly where if I click on the Edit Definition of such a component, nothing happens.  If I delete the pattern, the Edit Definition works fine.  The only explanation I could find online was to check the read only under operations, but there is none.

 

Weird, right?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Mahesh_Sharma
22-Sapphire I
(To:Greg_H)

Hi @Greg_H 

 

By any chance, is that component is in a group? If yes, ungrouping the pattern may allow redefine. 

 

Will it be possible to share same data? 

 

Thanks.  

View solution in original post

5 REPLIES 5
Mahesh_Sharma
22-Sapphire I
(To:Greg_H)

Hi @Greg_H 

 

By any chance, is that component is in a group? If yes, ungrouping the pattern may allow redefine. 

 

Will it be possible to share same data? 

 

Thanks.  

Wow, yep, that worked (better than deleting the pattern).  Wonder why though?

 

Patriot_1776
22-Sapphire II
(To:Greg_H)

Because the redefine probably won't work 2 layers down thru the pattern and then into the group.  I agree, it SHOULD work, but...

There a lot of that in CREO I've noticed 😞

 

One of my favorites is functionality that is turned off because an assembly is in exploded mode. Like, you can't replace components. Never understood that one.

Top Tags