Edit Definition does not work in a Pattern within an Assembly
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Edit Definition does not work in a Pattern within an Assembly
Just wondering if anyone else has run into this?
Typically I can change the constraints of a component in a pattern by clicking on the Edit Definition of the 1st instance. I have one assembly where if I click on the Edit Definition of such a component, nothing happens. If I delete the pattern, the Edit Definition works fine. The only explanation I could find online was to check the read only under operations, but there is none.
Weird, right?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Assembly Design
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi @Greg_H
By any chance, is that component is in a group? If yes, ungrouping the pattern may allow redefine.
Will it be possible to share same data?
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Hi @Greg_H
By any chance, is that component is in a group? If yes, ungrouping the pattern may allow redefine.
Will it be possible to share same data?
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Wow, yep, that worked (better than deleting the pattern). Wonder why though?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
Because the redefine probably won't work 2 layers down thru the pattern and then into the group. I agree, it SHOULD work, but...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
There a lot of that in CREO I've noticed 😞
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
One of my favorites is functionality that is turned off because an assembly is in exploded mode. Like, you can't replace components. Never understood that one.
