cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Need to share some code when posting a question or reply? Make sure to use the "Insert code sample" menu option. Learn more! X

Has anyone seen this in a dimension text?

pausob
18-Opal

Has anyone seen this in a dimension text?

A question a colleague asked which I can't answer - but hopefully someone here knows.  This is from an old drawing done in AutoCAD (from 2009 :)) We are trying to find out what the designer (who long since left) meant by this:

 

dimension_question.png

Units are in inches, and ordinate dimensioning scheme is used.

What does the +10° mean ?

ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
dgschaefer
21-Topaz II
(To:pausob)

I've seen dimension like this indicate draft on a molded part.  In other words, this dimension is the smallest that feature is and the draft is 10 degrees.

--
Doug Schaefer | Experienced Mechanical Design Engineer
LinkedIn

View solution in original post

5 REPLIES 5
dgschaefer
21-Topaz II
(To:pausob)

I've seen dimension like this indicate draft on a molded part.  In other words, this dimension is the smallest that feature is and the draft is 10 degrees.

--
Doug Schaefer | Experienced Mechanical Design Engineer
LinkedIn

Thanks Doug!  That makes sense in our situation.  Although this is a machined part... Just to follow up - this would be well understood by machine shops, or would you avoid such a callout?

dgschaefer
21-Topaz II
(To:pausob)

For molded parts, the standard now is to go off the CAD data.  The drawing only has critical to fit and inspection dims, so this note wouldn't be used now. I'm not sure it was very common in the first place, and I don't think I've ever seen it on a machined part.

 

If your machine shop is working off the drawing rather than the 3D data, you'd need a way to describe the entire part.  Personally, I never liked this way of calling out draft, I'd cut a section and add the angle dim there.  Of course, depending on the complexity of your part this could get complicated and time consuming.  I'm not sure how well understood this method is outside of the mold making world.  I also have no idea if it conforms to any standards.

--
Doug Schaefer | Experienced Mechanical Design Engineer
LinkedIn
Kevin
12-Amethyst
(To:dgschaefer)

ASME Y14.8 is the standard that shows it's usage. It also states that it shouldn't be used on features critical to function. For features critical to function you should use geometric controls.

KenFarley
21-Topaz I
(To:pausob)

Likely the other suggestions are correct, but I've also seen this type of dimension when the part being defined is going to be formed as a final operation into a cylindrical shape. A hole is specified in the "flat pattern" with a linear dimension for the machining operation, but gives the ultimate angle of the same hole in the "bent" part.

I don't really like this kind of thing because the angle is usually not calculated by the program, but just typed in text by the person making the drawing, and thus doesn't automatically update if the hole location is changed, etc.

Announcements
NEW Creo+ Topics: Real-time Collaboration


Top Tags