Community Tip - Did you get called away in the middle of writing a post? Don't worry you can find your unfinished post later in the Drafts section of your profile page. X
We adopted WF5 last week and I have had nothing but complaints from the user community regarding the increased amount of clicks to complete tasks. They have also found multiple problems using the show annotations tool. Does anyoneone have similar experiences or found ways to reduce the number of clicks in WF5 detailing.
Olaf,
You can set up the menu the way you depict. The first thing to do is go to the Toolbars tab in the Customize dialog box. In the upper right corner is a pulldown that lets you specify Left or Right for the menu bar. I just found that yesterday. It is also possible to arrange your toolbars below the menus as shown in one of the attached pictures. Of course now it's starting to take up a lot of vertical space.
I'm still playing with the UI and thinking about the optimal arrangement. I may have to minimize the ribbon and see how that plays out with the work flow. This discussion has helped a lot to get the ideas flowing.
Hi Raphael,
Thanks a lot for joining this discussion. This shows how dedicated PTC
is at listening to their customers.
One of *my* biggest complaints for now is about the position of the
standard File, Edit, View menu's.
With the Ribbon UI they were moved to the top *right* side of the
screen. They were obviously moved over there to save valuable screen
space.
But that is not intuitive at all. I know of *no* other Windows
application that has these commands in an other corner than the top
*left* corner.
Also some of these commands will be only available in a flyout menu on
smaller screen resolutions:
I was also told that these standard menu's will be gone in future
releases of ProE anyway.
With that I have to disagree completely. The fact that Microsoft decided
they didn't need them anymore in Office should not be the reason to
remove them from Pro/E. The idea behind the Ribbon Interface was to
simplify the command structure to a more taks based structure where you
just simply follow the task in the tab's from left to right and then
your finished. But working with 3D and 2D CAD is way more complex than
working with Office documents.
I think that PTC should keep on concentrating on an multi driven User
Interface with
*
General menu's: File, Edit, etc (with all the commands and
additional commands provided by toolkit applications)
These should be placed in the top left corner.
*
Toolbars (with the most important commands)
*
Ribbon UI (with all the commands)
Including a lot of the optimizations suggested by the users.
Like a quick Ribbon UI close/open button.
*
Dashboards
*
Mapkeys
To underline my idea. Here a Photoshopped version of the WF5 Drawing UI
as I would prefer it with the standard menu's in the top left corner and
a quick Ribbon UI toggle button.:
Olaf Corten
CAD/PLM Manager, Besi Competence Center - Other Business Applications
Fico BV, Ratio 6, 6921 RW Duiven, The Netherlands
Tel.: +31 26 3196215
Fax: +31 26 3196200
Mobile: +31 644548554
www.fico.nl http://www.fico.nl
We did implement keyboard shortcuts to switch tabs. This is activated by
pressing and releasing the ALT key. Not only can you switch tabs with
these key tips, but you can even choose commands that way.
Mapkeys have been designed to work outside the active tab as well as to
switch tabs. So, if you find that you have a command that you use often,
you can record a mapkey for it and it will run regardless of which tab
is active.
Someone mentioned customization of the ribbon. We did implement some
limited customization in Wildfire 5.0, but plan to offer much more
customization capability in Wildfire 6.0.
The ribbon can be minimized to clear up screen space - I think someone
mentioned that as well.
I could probably go on about other specifics, but I really wanted to
point out the thought process behind the UI decision and how it fits in
with a longer term strategy.
Thanks for your time and if anyone has additional comments, feel free to
email me.
Hi Raphael,
Thanks for joining in our discussion and making yourself avaliable. You've pointed out some things that I didn't know was possible and would like to test some of these things out. Could you comment on the show model annotations? It seems that when opening up a drawing created before WF5, there are a lot of model annotations that show up as being erased. Is there an easy way to delete the erased dimensions so the user can show dimensions by feature? Or is there a way to show erased dimensions other than going into the drawing tree and hunting for it view by view? I think the dimensioning is where I am getting the most complaints and after working more with the users I can see there point; it is very hard to find dimensions in many cases.
Thanks again,
Jason
I absolutely agree with Olaf .
cid:235424905@08042010-1711
I would be significantly more productive with this as it offers the best of
all worlds.
Ken...I found how to move the menubar to the left side of the screen, but how did you get the toolbar to go between the menubar and the ribbon?
Thanks,
Jason
Regarding using the keyboard shortcuts. I'm finding that when I click the ALT key I see the letter shortcuts. Then click L for Annotation to engage that tab. Why is another click required? I'm finding you have to either click the ALT button again or left click in the graphics screen before thefilter engages to select the desired object.What's the reasoning behind needing another click?
Past releases have taught us to use the Selection Filter. I've noticed the Filter changes options with each Tab selected. Would the User gain from having a small graphic to the left of the Filter selector that would display the Active Tab? With the Filter on the right side of the screen and the Tabs on the Left this might be a useful visual aid for the Filter selector?
I've also noticed that after Saving and Reopening a .drw file the default tab is Layout. Are there any thoughts here about returning to the last active tab when the drw file is opened? I had thought that might be useful only because we use drw templates. If we could save the Templates to the Annotation tab, or other tab, then when the Template is applied a user could start with Dimension Clean Up. My new drw workflow is Create with Template, Clean Up Dimensions, Orient the Views. Whenreopening an existing drw the ribbon tab is forcing the userto check for the appropriate Tab beforeany work can be started.
Kind Regards, Jim
In Reply:
I am trying to eval and understand the keyboard shortcuts that have been mentioned. With a drw active.....I click the ALT key...not holding it down to select an object....just single click the ALT key. The Ribbon displays small boxed letters...the shortcuts. When these are displayed I then click L for Layout or B for Table or S for Annotate. The tab changes as desired. Now....I have to either click the Alt button again or left click the graphic screen before I can make any selection of an object.
Yes....the interface appears to be waiting for another keystroke. Either another ALT click or screen click clears the lettered shortcuts. I was expecting some consistency. If you click ALT then the F key you get the File menu drop down. At this point you can click the X key to Exit or Select any other option in the File menu. There is no extra clicks required. However....in the Ribbon...you have to make another click or click the ALT key again. Shortcuts are supposed to be productive.....not redundant.
When you get a chance give it a try. If you click the ALT key the shortcut letters show up. Click the S, B or L key..the tab changes and the interface waits for another letter click. With the shortcut letters displayed you can not make any mouse selection from the Ribbon menus or the graphic screen. You must continue with a shortcut keystroke or click the ALT button again or click the screen before any menu selection or screen selection is permitted. If you use the File menu shortcut....ALT F...you can either continue with a letter click or mouse select.
Raphael opened the door to user input which is what I'm providing. There was dialog earlier about creating Mapkeys for shortcuts and then replies about the shortcuts that exist. I don't want to create Mapkeys if the shortcuts that exist work. I have already found that our Mapkeys, which work fine in WF4,for toggling datum features on/off had to be edited because although they worked in the Model they didn't work on the drw interface. I saw what I believed to be inconsistency in the interface between the Ribbon shortcuts and the other Menu shortcuts.
Regards, Jim
One of the great strengths of ProE has always been the level of UI customization, a majority of this discussion probably would probably nothave appeared if this had been available in the Detailing UI.
Most of us have a very small set of functions which we use 99% of the time and the rest we accept we have to hunt for on the rare occasions we use them. If this change in interface had included a 'quick access' toolbar as in MS Office it would have been an excellent interface, as it is, it just seems rushed. Adding mouse clicks is rarely a step forward,
Sean
I actually enjoy the ribbon interface for drawings, tho I would admit that it is likely only valuable in the drawing format. I make some fairly large models with many parts. The drawing mode tends to get VERY slow and convulsive. I usually have to change the selection to specify what I am actually trying to get at. The ribbon interface allows me to cycle between sub-modes which I can independently modify the selection state (ie: drawing view in the layout ribbon, annotate in the annotation ribbon, BOM ballon in the table ribbon, etc.). I can then accomplish all my actions associated with that ribbon and then move on to the next ribbon. If I need to return to a prior ribbon, my selection preference is still the same as I left it from the previous visit.
I can see how it would be annoying if one was only working with assemblies with less than say ... 100 parts in it. But for my application ... it is 10x faster and more stable in drawing mode than any of the WF predecessors.
One of the great strengths of ProE has always been the level of UI customization, a majority of this discussion probably would probably nothave appeared if this had been available in the Detailing UI.
Most of us have a very small set of functions which we use 99% of the time and the rest we accept we have to hunt for on the rare occasions we use them. If this change in interface had included a 'quick access' toolbar as in MS Office it would have been an excellent interface, as it is, it just seems rushed. Adding mouse clicks is rarely a step forward,
Sean
Hi Dustin,
We have had a small increase in un-expected exits since we have gone to WF5 at M030. What release are you on? How many users?
Also in regards to adding icons to the toolbar; I have experiencedicons disappearing after I add them to the tool bar..specifically the close window and erased not displayed icons. They never stay on the toolbar if I move the toolbar between the pull-down menu and the ribbon, and then place the pull-down menu to the left. Do you experience this as well?
In Reply to Dustin Hase:
....and more stable in drawing mode than any of the WF predecessors.
Interesting. We just updated from WF5 F000 to M030 (running XP64) running 2 users. I have not noticed an increase in exits between F000 and M030 (there are some however--most notably when attempting to assign BOM balloons to a view in a very large assembly). However, due to an unrelated issue with exporting to .pdf, we are being forced to run F000 installed in parallel until we can determine the cause.
My statement regarding stability is based our switch from WF3 to WF5 F000. I cannot speak to WF4 however. I spent an hour working on a drw in WF3 with multiple unexpected fails and little progress. After I gave up on WF3, it took less than 20 minutes to finish with one fail regarding the BOM balloons.
I have not noticed the toolbar issues you mention however. I've found them to be very stable as long as I don't let WF3 mess with them (I have WF3, WF5 F000, and WFM030 installed in parallel dirs). I used to have a similar issue in either WF1 or WF3, tho I cannot remember which.
Hi Dustin,
We have had a small increase in un-expected exits since we have gone to WF5 at M030. What release are you on? How many users?