cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community email notifications are disrupted. While we are working to resolve, please check on your favorite boards regularly to keep up with your conversations and new topics.

Coefficient result in square parentheses

Sergey
14-Alexandrite

Coefficient result in square parentheses

Hello.

 

Why is the calculated value given in square parentheses? Is there any specific reason for it?

Sergey_0-1717750887385.png

Best regards, Sergey

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Werner_E
24-Ruby V
(To:Sergey)

As I guessed! 😉

 

When you defined C.17 and all subsequent variables you uses square brackets where you rather should have used parentheses! So you created all these variables as 1x1 matrices.

Note the difference:

Werner_E_0-1717758783008.png

Werner_E_1-1717758822850.png

 

View solution in original post

9 REPLIES 9
ttokoro
20-Turquoise
(To:Sergey)

image.pngimage.png

Sergey
14-Alexandrite
(To:ttokoro)

Thank you. But what is the reason for square parentheses?

Werner_E
24-Ruby V
(To:Sergey)


@Sergey wrote:

Thank you. But what is the reason for square parentheses?


Why do you think that we can tell you that just from the pic you posted?

We don't see if you use vector indices or literal indices, we don't see how you defined A and C, ...

Post your sheet and chances are that you get an explanation why your result is a 1x1 matrix.

Sergey
14-Alexandrite
(To:Werner_E)

There is no vectors and no matrices in my calculations. Simple formulas as I posted the picture of.

 

Next time, I will  be more precise. Sorry.

Werner_E
24-Ruby V
(To:Sergey)


@Sergey wrote:

There is no vectors and no matrices in my calculations.

No, thats not true for sure!

My best guess is that you used square brackets instead of parentheses when you defined one or more of your variables.

Typing square brackets automatically creates a vector/matrix.

Werner_E_0-1717758215885.png

The last result is a 1x1 matrix because [b+c] is a 1x1 matrix.

 

Give it a try and evaluate each of the three involved variables (A.1, C.17,C.30) and you will see that at least one of them is a 1x1 matrix.

 

Sergey
14-Alexandrite
(To:Werner_E)

You are right 🙂

Sergey
14-Alexandrite
(To:Werner_E)

Here it is.

Werner_E
24-Ruby V
(To:Sergey)

As I guessed! 😉

 

When you defined C.17 and all subsequent variables you uses square brackets where you rather should have used parentheses! So you created all these variables as 1x1 matrices.

Note the difference:

Werner_E_0-1717758783008.png

Werner_E_1-1717758822850.png

 

Sergey
14-Alexandrite
(To:Werner_E)

Yes, now I see it. It is obvious....

Just didn't notice it. thanks a lot.

 

Best regards, Sergey

Top Tags