I can use the Maximize function for a finding only a one point.
And I must use the root function (not Maximize) for the creating f function.
Can you help me to use only the Minimize function here.
The problem: root(y(x), x) but Maximize(y, x)
See the picture and the Mathcad-sheet with cloud functions in attach.
Is only a matter of the order of the parameters.
The following works about more than ten times faster than the root version (which seems to be the reason you wanted a maximize version, I think).
Werner Exinger wrote:
Не вызывает случится, с удовольствием, Валерий!
or is it
Не выклікае здарыцца, з задавальненнем, Валерый!Hope Google translate got it right.
No - in this case the Google tranlator was not correct. The second is like Russian but not Russian.
Sorry, I know German ein bischen. Without Google
Werner Exinger wrote:
No - in this case the Google tranlator was not correct. The second is like Russian but not Russian.
Sorry, should have been something like "You are welcome, Valery" - "Keine Ursache, gern geschehen, Valery!"
I
Werner Exinger wrote:
BTW, why would anyone use Prime? Voluntariliy!!??
No - masochism
One joke.
Police dispersed in Moscow yesterday an unauthorized meeting of masochists.
Both sides have been very enjoying. 
PS
Photo: He protested against the replacement of Mathcad 15 on Mathcad Prime 
Maximize works with multiparaneter functions, too, but it seems that Prime has to be allowed to alter all the parameters then.
Solution: Dont know about Prime3 and Maximize, but in Prime2 it works using a solve block and an additional function inside the solveblock.
Here is a second solution without any auxiliary function. Again you would need a solve block. Personally I would prefer my first solution as I don't know to what precision the constrained p=P would be satisfied and if the given "guess value" for p would be adequate in all situations.
