Community Tip - You can Bookmark boards, posts or articles that you'd like to access again easily! X
Greeting, everyone
With the first approach, Mathcad cannot return to a solution. But the second one using Polyroots works.
And when I check with the eigenvalues derived from above, the determinant is not equal to 0, why?
Thank you for your time.
Best
Shawn
Solved! Go to Solution.
Are you sure it can't be solved, or is it just that it can't be displayed (which is the situation in Mathcad 15)? If the latter try replacing one of your integers by a floating point number as in my (M15) picture below (I can't test your file as I don't have Prime 3.1). Note that I've replaced the 1 in your M matrix by 1.0.
Alan
Sorry I forget to upload the file.
But this time it is still a 3.1 version.
Are you sure it can't be solved, or is it just that it can't be displayed (which is the situation in Mathcad 15)? If the latter try replacing one of your integers by a floating point number as in my (M15) picture below (I can't test your file as I don't have Prime 3.1). Note that I've replaced the 1 in your M matrix by 1.0.
Alan
Yes, Alan
Take the float to 3 for instance will display the solution.
But any thought on the the fact that the determinant is not equal to zero?
Thank you
Shawn
Shawn Fan wrote:
Yes, Alan
Take the float to 3 for instance will display the solution.
But any thought on the the fact that the determinant is not equal to zero?
Thank you
Shawn
Just limited numerical precision - especially if you use float 3. This not only limits the display, but, much more importantly, limits the precision of the intermediate calculations also. Below, I've used float 50.
Alan
Oh, that's right.
Now I know how the float plays. I used to think it just limit the display.
Thank you So Much!