cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - You can Bookmark boards, posts or articles that you'd like to access again easily! X

Using forEach to iterate through data being pulled from JSON in infotable

morganweiss33
10-Marble

Using forEach to iterate through data being pulled from JSON in infotable

I am getting an issue saying 'for each is only available in Mozilla JavaScript extensions (use moz option)'. I am trying to add rows to my infotable using data being pulled in from a JSON file. 

 

Is there another way to do this? Thanks!

ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

data.array[i].isbn ended up working for me, thank you!

View solution in original post

7 REPLIES 7

for each should work in Twx, even if not, you can change to use for (i<row) command to iterate the data

yanchen
15-Moonstone
(To:zyuan1)

Yes, Ryan is correct, ThingWorx uses Rhino JS Engine thus supports for each

Thank you! When I switch to rows I get a return of no data though, do you see any obvious errors?

Hi @morganweiss33.

 

Try changing this row:  for (var i=0; i < data.rows;i++) {

to:  for (var i=0; i < data.array.length;i++) {

 

Refer to this article for more information.

 

Regards.

 

--Sharon

 

Hi @morganweiss33.

 

If one of the previous responses answered your question, please mark the appropriate one as the Accepted Solution for the benefit of others with the same question.

 

Regards.

 

--Sharon

Hello @morganweiss33,

 

tl;dr Use for(var i = 0..... as @slangley suggests.

 

ThingWorx infotables look like JavaScript arrays, but they are not. You can use forEach and its friends, but to do it you have to wrap infotable rows into js Array explicitly like that:

var nativeArray = Array.from(myInfotable);

 

Here's a very useful (!) example of this technique, which randomly disables half of your GenericThings:

var result = 'Disabled ' + Array.from(ThingTemplates["GenericThing"].QueryImplementingThings({ maxItems: 100000 }))
	.map(t => Things[t.name])
	.filter(t => {
		if (Math.random() < 0.5 && t.IsEnabled()) {
			t.DisableThing();
			return true;
		} else {
			return false;
		}
	}).length + ' things';

 

That looks cool, but apparently it requires some data copying (sadly Rhino !== V8) and thus works slower than for-based approach straight from ALGOL. I don't remember the right figures, but for me it was something like twice slower, on that scale.

 

Regards,
Constantine

data.array[i].isbn ended up working for me, thank you!

Announcements


Top Tags