cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Need help navigating or using the PTC Community? Contact the community team. X

Batch editing with Arbortext

ClayHelberg
18-Opal

Batch editing with Arbortext

Hi Steve--



You can execute Arbortext commands from the command line in Windows
using the -c switch, which means you could set up a batch file to do
what you want.



The batch file would look roughly like this: (untested, debugging left
as an exercise)



:: resave.bat



:: set the following based on your version/environment

set arbortext=C:\Program Files\PTC\Arbortext Editor\bin\x64\editor.exe

for %%i in (%1) do "%arbortext%" -c "save" "%%i"



HTH



--Clay




8 REPLIES 8

Steve,


Gareth mentions this, but I use the concept of "normalizing" the XML/SGML. I use a $30 program called Search & Replace by Funduc Software (www.funduc.com). You can run it using an UI, or through scripts. I have some scripts that are 100's of lines manipulating the heck out of a document for some reason or another. The one I use to normalize simply puts everything on its own line, start tags always start the line... and so on.


The problem with relying on Arbortext to save a document is that it uses the recordlength setting to determine where to break a line. When you modify the document it can shift a lot based on entering the letter "a". Point is, just because you save both documents with Arbortext won't guarantee that they will line up when doing a line-by-line comparason. I use this concept everyday trying to figure out why a new version of a document doesn't publish the same way it's previous version did (barring changes, of course).


HTH,


Bob

Not that this answers the original question for an external diff function,
but the editor is able to compare files. I'm assuming it compares them in
an XML aware manner.

..dan

> Steve,
> Gareth mentions this, but I use the concept of "normalizing" the XML/SGML.
> I use a $30 program called Search & Replace by Funduc Software
> (www.funduc.com). You can run it using an UI, or through scripts. I have
> some scripts that are 100's of lines manipulating the heck out of a
> document for some reason or another. The one I use to normalize simply
> puts everything on its own line, start tags always start the line... and
> so on.
> The problem with relying on Arbortext to save a document is that it uses
> the recordlength setting to determine where to break a line. When you
> modify the document it can shift a lot based on entering the letter "a".
> Point is, just because you save both documents with Arbortext won't
> guarantee that they will line up when doing a line-by-line comparason. I
> use this concept everyday trying to figure out why a new version of a
> document doesn't publish the same way it's previous version did (barring
> changes, of course).
> HTH,
> Bob
>
>

Thanks for all the tips.

I really like the suggestion of using an external tool to “pretty print” the XML. Is there a way to do this as a save hook in Arbortext?

Steve

Be sure to do some testing with the pretty-print. We ran into an issue
where some of our developers were using XMLSpy that introduced undesirable
whitespace between text and tags. In general, whitespace in XML is
typically ignored, but for us, even a single space made our output look
funny. Breaks that take place within the tags themselves should avoid
this issue.

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Steven Anderson
<sanderson@salesforce.com>wrote:

> Thanks for all the tips. ****
>
> ** **
>
> I really like the suggestion of using an external tool to "pretty print"
> the XML. Is there a way to do this as a save hook in Arbortext?****
>
> ** **
>
> Steve****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Bob Spangenburg [
> I use a $30 program called Search & Replace by Funduc Software (
> www.funduc.com). You can run it using an UI, or through scripts. I have
> some scripts that are 100's of lines manipulating the heck out of a
> document for some reason or another. The one I use to normalize simply puts
> everything on...















Clay, this is working really well for me *except* the checksum PI is included at the end. Any idea how to do the save without that PI?

Steve

Hi Steve--



You can do this by adding the -nopi flag to the save command:



:: set the following based on your version/environment

set arbortext=C:\Program Files\PTC\Arbortext Editor\bin\x64\editor.exe

for %%i in (%1) do "%arbortext%" -c "save -nopi" "%%i"



Note that this will remove most Arbortext PI's from the save file,
including _font and _link PI's. If you don't want that, you may have to
use some kind of post-processor like a PERL script to strip out just the
checksum PI.



--Clay



Clay Helberg

Senior Consultant

TerraXML


Do "help set writepi".



Starting in 6.0 there are 5 choices to allow you to pick which category
of PIs you want saved.



Also starting in 6.0, we no longer write/use the checksum PI.



paul




That's great news. Another reason to push our switch to 6.0.

Announcements

Top Tags