cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Want the oppurtunity to discuss enhancements to PTC products? Join a working group! X

Mathcad Error_Differential Equations_3 types of solutions

주봉_10843142
6-Contributor

Mathcad Error_Differential Equations_3 types of solutions

Hello, Expert guys in this community.

 

Recently I have received help to solve the problems in using Mathcad Prime 9.0. Appreciate it.

 

However, since I am just beginner level guy, I am having difficults with ODE solutions.

(In addition, if you can solve those equations with AdamsBDF, then pleas add it)

 

Please check attached worksheet files.

 

Your help will be very much appreciated.

 

Thanks!!

ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions


@주봉_10843142 wrote:

Thanks for the help.

 

However,if that is the bug, then what I should do about it? 😞


As I had written, it may not be a bug in case of the ODE you provided as the help clearly states that you can only solve ODEs which are linear in the highest order derivative which is not the case in your ODE.

https://support.ptc.com/help/mathcad/r9.0/en/#page/PTC_Mathcad_Help/ode_function.html

Werner_E_0-1710167075040.png


I may be wrong and maybe others have some idea to come up with a solution, but I think that unless the symbolic "solve" shown above would finally finish its calculation (I cancelled the operation as it took too long for me) I fear that Prime simply is not able and capable enough to solve your equation 😞

The stand alone solvers like AdamsBDF won't help either as they would require you to explicitly solve the ODE for y2'(t)=....

View solution in original post

8 REPLIES 8

Method 1:

You have to supply the initial condition for the y2 function INSIDE the solve block, in the 'constraints' part.

Your 'symbols' carry no units, hence y2 cannot use units. The initial condition y2(0*s)=0*m that you state above the solve block uses units...

 

Method 2: You have no derivative for the function x(t). This might not work with odesolve.

 

Method 3: F(y) is undefined. In general a constraint for odesolve needs a derivative of the sought function on the left hand segment of a constraint (to the left of =).

 

I suggest you look up examples of ODE's in the on-line help of Prime.

 

Success!
Luc

 

 

 

Werner_E
25-Diamond I
(To:LucMeekes)

I played around with Method 1 and even by providing a correct IC it did not work.

I guess I tracked it down to a bug in Prime:

Werner_E_0-1710090089468.png

Have not succeeded rewriting the ODE in Method 1 so that the bug would not apply

 

BTW, the bug is already present in Mathcad 15 (error message is "Cannot understand this syntax").

How about MC11 ?

LucMeekes
23-Emerald III
(To:Werner_E)

 

Mathcad 11 says:

LucMeekes_0-1710104736183.png

and:

LucMeekes_2-1710105127018.png

In other words, Mathcad will not simplify the ODE (collecting identical derivatives to simplify the second ODE to the first) as

optimisation of the ODE cannot be set.

 

Luc

Werner_E
25-Diamond I
(To:LucMeekes)

I would call this a bug.

And its surprising that its such an old one ...

 

The error in the OP's sheet may not be called a bug, though, as the help states that odesolve would only solve ODE's which are linear in their highest derivative term which is not the case with the given ODE.


But I think we have already seen ODEs solved correctly which also were not linear wrt the highest derivative - but then I may be wrong, not sure.

 

As Odesolve fails with an ODE like

Werner_E_0-1710143315681.png

but the new symbolic ODE solver succeeds

Werner_E_1-1710143414452.png

I gave the ODE in Method1 a try

Werner_E_2-1710143485155.png

But the calculation seemed not to finish in finite time, so I had to cancel it.

 

 

 

 

Yes indeed,,,,I had tried the same way which you showed above....but it seems like a lot of caculation needed (so much computing power required)....so  I stopped it. 

 

Whatelse I can do?..... 😞

Cornel
19-Tanzanite
(To:Werner_E)


I think it's not so easy to solve this kind of differential eq...
Cornel_1-1710150444658.png

 

Thanks for the help.

 

However,if that is the bug, then what I should do about it? 😞


@주봉_10843142 wrote:

Thanks for the help.

 

However,if that is the bug, then what I should do about it? 😞


As I had written, it may not be a bug in case of the ODE you provided as the help clearly states that you can only solve ODEs which are linear in the highest order derivative which is not the case in your ODE.

https://support.ptc.com/help/mathcad/r9.0/en/#page/PTC_Mathcad_Help/ode_function.html

Werner_E_0-1710167075040.png


I may be wrong and maybe others have some idea to come up with a solution, but I think that unless the symbolic "solve" shown above would finally finish its calculation (I cancelled the operation as it took too long for me) I fear that Prime simply is not able and capable enough to solve your equation 😞

The stand alone solvers like AdamsBDF won't help either as they would require you to explicitly solve the ODE for y2'(t)=....

Announcements

Top Tags