Community Tip - Have a PTC product question you need answered fast? Chances are someone has asked it before. Learn about the community search. X
Hii,
I am facing another error regarding the unit.
It shows that the units are not compatible. What it means and how to solve this?
Regards
Arun
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi Arun,
It is another empirical equation using square root of f.ck do this:
Cheers
Terry
@Arun_15 wrote:
Hii,
I am facing another error regarding the unit.
It shows that the units are not compatible. What it means and how to solve this?
Regards
Arun
Hi,
you add "problematic" expression to constant 11. Therefore the expression must be unitless ... please take a paper and pencil and check it.
Example:
Thank you, Mr.Martin!
The equation contains no unit for the numbers. Is there any other way to get the result?
Regards
Arun
Your expression can only work if f.ck is unitless and rho.0 and rho have the same unit. The simple reason is that you are adding the unitless 11 to parts involving those variables and subtracting the unitless 1 from the division of rho.0 and rho .
Next time, please attach the worksheet.
Success!
Luc
Thank you, Luc!
Now It's clear. Will try.
Cheers!
Arun
Hi Arun,
It is another empirical equation using square root of f.ck do this:
Cheers
Terry
Thank you, Terry!
I'd tried it before, but it had not worked, and now it's working. Previously I couldn't assign the values correctly, I think so!
Thank you again, Terry! It was very helpful.
Cheers🥂
Arun
Hi Arun
Sometimes when typing the MPa under the f.ck Prime tags it with the variable label automatically.
In this case you need to assign it as a unit label. highlight it and set label as unit
Then you get the MPa as units
Cheers
Terry
Thank you, Terry!
I'd faced this before and solved it on my own.
Thanks for your concern.
Cheers
Arun