confrac,matrix function 2.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
confrac,matrix function 2.
- Labels:
-
Other
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
I don't know why you are confused. What you are doing the whole time is calculating approximations. With different substitutions you get different aproximation-functions. This is especially true as you compare a linear substitution to a nonlinear one. Your 1/x substitution has quite some advantages, though.
While I can see no reason why someone would do that I find it strange and have no suitable explanation for tha fact that applying confrac a second time makes the approximation that bad.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
As with a Taylor series you can have a continued fraction, but not a standard one with respect to x but e.g. with respect to x-1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Notify Moderator
I don't know why you are confused. What you are doing the whole time is calculating approximations. With different substitutions you get different aproximation-functions. This is especially true as you compare a linear substitution to a nonlinear one. Your 1/x substitution has quite some advantages, though.
While I can see no reason why someone would do that I find it strange and have no suitable explanation for tha fact that applying confrac a second time makes the approximation that bad.
