cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Visit the PTCooler (the community lounge) to get to know your fellow community members and check out some of Dale's Friday Humor posts! X

Translate the entire conversation x

What is this icon in Creo .asm tree

Yogesh.T
14-Alexandrite

What is this icon in Creo .asm tree

Came across this unseen ICON . Any one can throw some light on this one? Thx in advance.

SEE ATTACH

ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

12 REPLIES 12

Hi,

please read https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS58783 document.


Martin Hanák
Dale_Rosema
23-Emerald III
(To:Yogesh.T)

In case you don't have access to the article to which Martin linked:

 

Dale_Rosema_0-1746626748287.png

 

Yogesh.T
14-Alexandrite
(To:Dale_Rosema)

What is unplaced/ ? How does that happen? either it will not assemble or will assemble with assumptions or fully assemble. Not understanding what unplaced/included is.

KenFarley
21-Topaz II
(To:Yogesh.T)

If you just bring in a model in an assembly but don't apply any placement constraints to locate it in the assembly, it's put at some sort of default place (probably using the "default" coordinate systems but I don't care 'cause it's bad practice so I dont' do it). These components are considered "unplaced" and the model tree uses an icon for them to represent this.

Possible scenario where one would purposely use this: you want to include some "spare parts" such as bolts, extra lenses, whatever. You bring them into the assembly in this way so they'll show up on the Bill of Materials, but don't really care where they are located in 3D space.

StephenW
23-Emerald III
(To:Yogesh.T)

It's really an "include" component, a way to get an item on a model without it showing up in the 3D. It's "included" but not assembled.

 

StephenW_0-1746641533731.png

 

Yogesh.T
14-Alexandrite
(To:StephenW)

Thanks SW,

Could you provide a genuine scenario where this approach is the best choice, and why other options might not be suitable? Could you provide a genuine scenario where this approach is the best choice, and why other options might not be suitable?

Chris3
21-Topaz I
(To:Yogesh.T)

Its meant for components that you don't have a 3D model for but want included on a BOM. Think paints, primers, lubricants and epoxies.

Yogesh.T
14-Alexandrite
(To:Chris3)

Understood now! Makes perfect sense. Why was i not thinking about this?? :)))

StephenW
23-Emerald III
(To:Yogesh.T)

Components that you need accounted for in the BOM but don't want to see in the model and/or add to the model weight. 

I have never been anywhere that used Include specifically but I have been places that want their bulk items "in the model" to drive BOM integration.

It's what I would call a "niche" thing, if you don't have a reason for it, you'll never use it. Generally the reason is a company has some specific use case and they are automating BOM to other systems.

Yogesh.T
14-Alexandrite
(To:StephenW)

Hi, Some have included components that are needed to be seen in the assembly. How do I change them from Include to assemble?

StephenW
23-Emerald III
(To:Yogesh.T)

@Yogesh.T 

Just use Edit Definition on the included component

I tested using Creo+

Dale_Rosema
23-Emerald III
(To:StephenW)

I tried to work with this, but it is giving me the error:

Assembly license is required to use this functionality.

Announcements
NEW Creo+ Topics: Real-time Collaboration

Top Tags