cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - When posting, your subject should be specific and summarize your question. Here are some additional tips on asking a great question. X

Translate the entire conversation x

Inverse Laplace Transform and Absolute Value

DamienB
3-Newcomer

Inverse Laplace Transform and Absolute Value

Currently using MathCAD v15 (M050). I have Prime 10 but am having licensing issues at the moment.

 

Anyway, I'm having trouble understanding why the invlaplace function won't evaluate as shown in the attachment. If I remove the absolute value sign, then it all works as expected (am I just running up against a domain issue and need to use the "assume" keyword.....or something......?)

Any advice is welcomed and appreciated! If Prime 10 has no problem with it, then that's my answer (just gotta lean on IT to get the license issues sorted).

 

Thanks!

3 REPLIES 3
Werner_E
25-Diamond I
(To:DamienB)

Looks like what you demand is too hard for the symbolics in Mathcad.

Its also too hard for Prime's symbolics:

Werner_E_0-1763498792296.png

 

And Wolfram Alpha isn't able to come up with the desired result |sin(t)| either:

Werner_E_1-1763498901608.png

 

Werner_E
25-Diamond I
(To:Werner_E)

In Mathematics the absolute function is kind of a beast which usually is quite hard to handle.

Much more difficult like a simple function like the squaring

Werner_E_2-1763499722639.png

or even the Heaviside function

Werner_E_3-1763499818094.png

(we see "1" instead of "Phi(t)" because the result of course is valid only for t>=0).

 

 

We could try to rewrite the absolute value using the modulo function, but unfortunately the laplace operator can't deal with the modulo function

Werner_E_4-1763500022901.png

 

 

 

 

DamienB
3-Newcomer
(To:Werner_E)

Thank you for the response!

Announcements

Top Tags