cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - You can change your system assigned username to something more personal in your community settings. X

OdeSolve for 2 point BVP

JohnRudnicki
15-Moonstone

OdeSolve for 2 point BVP

I am trying to solve a two point boundary value problem. Instead of three initial conditions for the problem, I am giving the value at the end of the solution interval. Can I use odesolve? My initial attempt (below and in attached worksheet) was not successful. If not what else? I have not solved this type of problem before. I know "shooting methods" are one possible approach, but I do not know how to set this up in MC. Any help would be appreciated. FYI I am using MC14, but saved the sheet as MC 11.  Thanks.

 

JohnRudnicki_0-1692628081565.png

 

ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

You might consider the attached PDF article from Dr. Tom Co 11/3/2008. Mathcad 15 and Prime 8 worksheets attached.

 

View solution in original post

9 REPLIES 9

You might consider the attached PDF article from Dr. Tom Co 11/3/2008. Mathcad 15 and Prime 8 worksheets attached.

 

Here's another approach using Laplace transforms. I think original content is courtesy of Luc Meekes.

Thanks. I will take a look.

bvp.pdf and BVP_15.xmcd were very helpful, but I could not open the *.mcdx files. What kind of mc files are they. (Not sure the Laplace transform approach will work since the problem is non-linear). 

Sorry. Never mind. Just saw they were prime files and downloaded Prime to open. Thanks again.

LucMeekes
23-Emerald III
(To:JohnRudnicki)

I had to rewrite the differential equations, or Mathcad 11 would not understand. (It seems it likes the highest order differential on the LHS better).

Then a little experimenting gives:

LucMeekes_0-1692654855989.png

LucMeekes_1-1692654874781.png

Is that close enough for you?

 

Success!
Luc

 

Yes! Nice. Thanks. John

Werner_E
25-Diamond I
(To:LucMeekes)


@LucMeekes wrote:

 

Is that close enough for you?

 

 


If its not close enough then the value for w10 can be improved by turning the solve block into a function of w10 and use either another solve block or the root() function to get the 'optimal' value for w10 within Mathcad's numeric precision.

Werner_E_1-1692700839319.png

 

 

Thanks. Good to know.

Announcements

Top Tags