I guess Fred is right that its simply a try to convert units and that can be done much easier in Mathcad.
Furthermore I had another look at your sheet and noticed that something strange has happened to the expression highlighted in the following picture. I deleted that expression and retyped it and now the resulted value is as expected, the dimension still is length, of course.

Actually the expression does not make much sense, because it equals to just 1:

Mathcad of course knows that 1 ft^2 = 144 in^2.
The discrepancy 224.3 vs. the 225 seen by Fred stems from the fact, that Freds conversion factor from Wikipedia assumes a sea water density of 64 lb/ft^3 while your calculation seems to assume 64.2 lb/ft^3.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.

