Skip to main content
1-Visitor
September 21, 2010
Question

Units

  • September 21, 2010
  • 34 replies
  • 5619 views

I'm used to seeing feet, inches and pounds usedin this forum but had kind of assumed it was a legacy thing, I was quite surprised to learn that (as one of the last three countries with Burma and Liberia) the US still has imperial units as its official measurement system.

From a professional point of view it would be useful to know whether US college engineering students are taughtat all inSI units aswe're starting to see a lot more US graduates here in the UK,

Cheers, Sean

    34 replies

    23-Emerald III
    September 21, 2010
    Yes, When I was in school here in the US (1996-2003, Texas Tech University) we used SI units in class more than imperial units. I was also working at the time for a company building construction equipment for Caterpillar who uses SI units also.
    That being said, most US students (in my opinion) still don't have a feel for SI units. Day to day life is still thought of in feet, inches, lbs and then converted if necessary. I'm one of those...I have worked at companies that use SI units for 14 yrs and still basically convert everything in my head so I get a relative feel for the size or weight or whatever.

    Steve

    ----------
    1-Visitor
    September 21, 2010
    I can comment that in my career (I'm now 50) we always used SI units, in
    High School and College, (Ill Institute of Technology, Cleveland State
    Univ., Univ. of Akron) Although I never used them in industry.



    I personally would like to see us eliminate all use of imperial units
    from 'professional' services such as Engineering and manufacturing,
    leaving only Imperial units for some consumer goods such as food,
    gasoline, building materials, etc... I think that this is happening. I
    understand that in England a wooden wall stud is still called a 4x2,
    even though it is not manufactured in inches. ( it's probably more
    difficult to call it a 100x50, this doesn't quite roll off of the
    tongue, maybe 10x5 (in cm) would be better).



    My children are all being taught SI units (cm, mm, and km for length,
    and kg and gm for weight) in their day to day studies in primary school.




    One of the first uses I find for going to SI units is describing
    mechanical components, with the concepts of fractional measurements
    being the most troublesome.



    For example to 'accurately' show a dimension of 3/16", the decimal value
    is .1875". When modeling this in Pro-e you need all 4 decimal places,
    the system does not use fractions directly. When showing the dimension
    on a drawing, showing .1875 +/-.0300 is frowned upon (at my workplace)
    because of all of the trailing zeros in the tolerance. I have the
    option of showing the dimension as 3/16+/-1/32, but this is messy in
    pro-E. I could just round up/down to 2 or three decimal places, but for
    'design intent' I do really want the nominal dimension to be 3/16", not
    .19".



    One of our customers uses imperial units but shows all dimensions to 4
    decimal places, trailing zeros be damned. They also comment that the
    number of decimal places does not imply a tolerance, and explicitly show
    all dimension tolerances that differ from the 'default' tolerance.



    Happily this will all go by the wayside when digital product definition
    becomes more mainstream.



    Note that you do not have this duality of fractional vs. decimal
    dimensioning in SI units. I find also that more people are willing to
    use 'preferred numbers' when using decimal dimensions.



    I anticipate that because a majority of machinists are taught in
    imperial units, and most shops have most of their measuring tools
    defined in imperial units, that they will be around for some time. Two
    things can change this, CMM inspection to digital product definition
    models, and the requirement to report inspection results in the native
    units. (no measuring the features using imperial gages, and then
    converting and reporting the result in SI units).





    Christopher F. Gosnell



    FPD Company

    124 Hidden Valley Road

    McMurray, PA 15317
    1-Visitor
    September 21, 2010
    I graduated from Penn State with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 2000.
    In my studies there, we used SI units at least half the time. It varied by
    textbook & instructor. Many professors insisted on using both (sometimes in
    the same problem) as they knew we would face that scenario on graduation ( a
    fact which has been borne out in my professional life)





    --



    Lyle Beidler
    MGS Inc
    178 Muddy Creek Church Rd
    Denver PA 17517
    717-336-7528
    Fax 717-336-0514
    <">mailto:-> -
    <">http://www.mgsincorporated.com>
    1-Visitor
    September 21, 2010
    Sean,

    The imperial system is alive and well here in the USA. Most
    professionals use it with aplomb, the SI system is as foreign as a five
    legged cow. It does cause some confusion and I suspect most "American"
    Engineers carry out a conversion in their heads when using the metric
    system. For me, it is difficult to get used to "thous" again and I try
    my best to convert any Engineers to microns though to date I have had
    little success. It is all rather a moot point because if a guy/gal is of
    any worth he/she will work in both systems while finding one more
    comfortable.

    I still can't get used to weighing too much in pounds instead of stones!

    Cheers back at ya,

    Richard
    1-Visitor
    September 21, 2010
    I have had problems in the past when in conversation with the US office of
    our UK company, I would talk about 'mils' (meaning millimetres) and they
    would talk about 'mils' (meaning milli-inches - always referred to as
    'thous' in England). Huge potential for embarrassment, but fortunately, it
    was always sorted out before anything was manufactured!

    Talking to machinists, the good old 'thou' is still used a lot, as it is
    just such a convenient unit for turning and milling - much more useful than
    0.0254mm.

    In UK, we have been officially SI for longer than I can remember
    (literally), but my children still glibly use Feet, Inches and Stones when
    describing a person's height and weight. Incidentally, I don't suppose 12
    Stone means any more to a US engineer than 76kg would, despite being a valid
    Imperial unit! Equally, telling me a person weighs 168 pounds is no help at
    all. It's what you are used to. When I was a teenager, we used to pick
    Brussels Sprouts into a Bushel Box. You don't hear much about Bushels these
    days. It's a handy volume measurement, though.

    For modelling, calculations, drawings, etc. I would always choose SI, though
    - it is much easier that way. Particularly, I find it useful, in engineering
    calculations, to strip everything on both sides of the equation back to m,
    kg and s, just to make sure that the units make sense. I find it much more
    difficult to do that in Imperial units.

    There remains the mystery that, in England, engineers talk in millimetres
    and metres, but children are taught in centimetres and metres. I am sure
    there is a good reason...
    Then there are all the other obscure unit systems, like the one that refers
    to parts of the anatomy of a gnat in relation to a small distance.

    Interesting to hear that US schools teach SI, though. We will all get to
    using the same system eventually.

    Cheers,
    John
    1-Visitor
    September 21, 2010
    Well, a lot of discussion happened over this topic in other forums. And
    it is a good topic to understand more about the pluses and minuses of
    both the worlds of units of measurement.



    23-Emerald III
    September 21, 2010
    After sending this I realized I didn't put the most important part...I WOULD MUCH RATHER WORK IN SI UNITS. It's so much easier. This is coming from a guy who grew up using imperial units and yes I did learn a little about the metric system in grade school all the way through college. But when I actually became immersed in it in business, I realized how much easier it is to use. So many things take care of themselves in SI. AND, like someone else said, no pesky fractions to make life difficult.

    Now I work in the oil industry in Houston. Wow, what a step back in the past. We still put fractions on drawings for welding.
    21-Topaz II
    September 21, 2010
    Back in grade school in the 70's, there was a push by politicians to
    move to 'the metric system', but it seems that they pushed to hard and
    fast. The older generations pushed back, I think there was some
    silliness of metric not being American and whatnot, and so they backed
    off and no one would touch it. Seems if we just started putting both
    units on things for a while, it may take a generation, but we'll get
    there.

    Personally, I'm more comfortable with imperial units, but certainly
    understand the benefits of metric.

    Doug Schaefer
    15-Moonstone
    September 21, 2010
    God, I hope we never use SI for general purpose. I'm fully conversant with SI and can and will use it when needed, but I hate the idea that they tried to force this on us beginning in the 70's as someone else pointed out. Even with all the pressure we simply won't use SI and the time has come for us to stop pushing it. I have no problem teaching it alongside the Imperial units (English units here) just as we should learn any other languages we can. We have wasted far too much effort and money trying to force this. If and when people decide that they are comfortable with it, it will change. I've always found it interesting that even the rest of the world has maintained certain things in inches, namely wheel sizes on cars. They are still in 14,15,16 inch and so on. In the early 80's Ford and Michelin tried coming out with 360mm and 395 mm wheels and tires for some of their cars. It couldn't catch on not just here but everywhere. I'm not for forcing anyone else to change to English units please don't try to force us to change ours. It's another language, that's all. We need to be conversant in both.

    Rob Reifsnyder
    Mechanical Design Engineer/ Pro/E Librarian
    L
    Mission Systems & Sensors (MS2)
    497 Electronics Parkway
    Liverpool, NY 13088
    EP5-Quad2, Cube 281
    1-Visitor
    September 21, 2010
    Didn't NASA try using both units on a Mars mission? I believe that didn't work so well. 😉

    Tim P. Cooper
    LMES, Houston
    ITL Facility and Mockups Design
    LM1 / Rm. 666

    Physical Address: Correspondence:
    2625 Bay Area Blvd LM1, Mail Code: A7A
    Houston, TX 77058 P.O. Box 58487
    (281) 283-4372 Houston, TX 77258-8784
    (281) 283-4340 (F)