Skip to main content
15-Moonstone
August 3, 2021
Question

Symmetric revolve 359.75 degrees

  • August 3, 2021
  • 6 replies
  • 6103 views

I'm pretty sure I could do a symmetric revolve up to 359.9 degrees in previous versions of Creo. 

 

Could someone let me know if that is true? 

 

I am using Creo 8 right now and it's maxing out at 359.5.

 

SYNDAKIT_0-1628013986482.png

 

6 replies

23-Emerald III
August 3, 2021

I'm on Creo 4 M130 and I max at 359.5.

StephenWilliams_0-1628015127112.png

 

 

SYNDAKIT15-MoonstoneAuthor
15-Moonstone
August 3, 2021

The reason this came up is because I thought I could do it before but when I just tried today it wouldn't let me.

 

I decided to grab some older models to see and yeah I could do 359.9.

Furthermore, I can copy that feature into other parts and it works okay, I just can't create a new revolve feature and rotate it symmetrically 359.9 degrees...... weird.

 

Here is the part I'm talking about:

SYNDAKIT_0-1628019244059.png

 



21-Topaz I
August 3, 2021

Have you tried changing the accuracy?

21-Topaz I
August 3, 2021

I can do 359.9

Capture.JPG

SYNDAKIT15-MoonstoneAuthor
15-Moonstone
August 3, 2021

Change it to symmetric and let me know.

24-Ruby III
August 4, 2021

INFO:

In Creo 3.0 M190 I can create 359.99 symmetric revolve using PTC solid_part_mmks.prt template (attached)

In Creo 8.0.0.0 I can create 359.5 symmetric revolve (only) using  the same template.

 

Please ask PTC Support to explain Creo behavior.

SYNDAKIT15-MoonstoneAuthor
15-Moonstone
August 4, 2021

Martin,

Your're the man!
thank you.

23-Emerald III
August 4, 2021

It's an odd thing, like it is hard-coded in as a limitation. It's not like a regen failure due to accuracy issues.

But I do think Frank is right, Creo doesn't like itty bitty slivers.

kdirth
21-Topaz I
21-Topaz I
August 4, 2021

The only thing I can offer is a work around.  Sketch an arc and use a sweep.  I have been able to create a 359.998 degree surface with this method.

There is always more to learn.
24-Ruby III
August 5, 2021
21-Topaz I
August 5, 2021

Sounds like one of those cases (I have run into a few) where the programmers were like well this is too complex of a math problem to solve so we are just going to make an arbitrary limit that we know will work.