Skip to main content
Q
qnen1-Visitor
1-Visitor
May 2, 2016
Question

Using view styles in drawings

  • May 2, 2016
  • 1 reply
  • 2541 views

Wildfire 5.0

In the assembly, I have created a style with certain exterior objects blanked.   I was hoping to use this in a drawing to aid in placing BOM balloons on internal components.   The end goal is a drawing with various views with more and more components showing in different exploded states with BOM balloons driven by one single table.     I am finding it easier said than done.  Pro/E doesn't seem to want to do this.    Any ideas or techniques/suggestions would be appreciated.

qnen, KC


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.

1 reply

S
23-Emerald III
StephenW23-Emerald III
23-Emerald III
May 2, 2016

So by view styles, are you saying your are using simplified reps? Unfortunately, pro/e or Creo has never really supported BOM ballons across views with different simplified reps. There are some work-arounds though.

You may want to visit this post Re: Create a BOM index between Simplified reps You may want to look in to pro process for assembly, it might fit your need better and it's really easy.

Q
qnen1-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
May 2, 2016

Simplified reps would work.   In this particular instance, it is being attempted with combined state.   With combined state, the component display doesn't come into the drawing.  With simplified reps, the BOM balloons don't work.   There is always the component display option, but it seems silly to have to redo all the work you did already in the assembly. 

As I am now finding, this has been asked several times in several different ways in various forums, all with the same end result.    There is even a PTC case on it.  CS17807.

As everyone else has said, ARGH!

Q
qnen1-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
May 2, 2016

....first line should have read, Simplified reps don't work.  

Terms & ConditionsCookie settingsAccessibility statement