Skip to main content
Best answer by Werner_E

Very strange effects indeed.

The wrong result from muPad (in real Mathcad and in Prime up to V.6) worries me more than the strange "unknown" error from the new symbolic engine.
I vaguely remember that a similar error of the old symbolic was already discussed in the forum quite a while ago.

Here are the results in Prime 6:

Werner_E_0-1635682443427.png

 

Changing the lower limit of the integral cures the problem for both symbolic engines

Werner_E_1-1635682513496.png

 

 

1 reply

W
Werner_E25-Diamond IAnswer
25-Diamond I
October 31, 2021

Very strange effects indeed.

The wrong result from muPad (in real Mathcad and in Prime up to V.6) worries me more than the strange "unknown" error from the new symbolic engine.
I vaguely remember that a similar error of the old symbolic was already discussed in the forum quite a while ago.

Here are the results in Prime 6:

Werner_E_0-1635682443427.png

 

Changing the lower limit of the integral cures the problem for both symbolic engines

Werner_E_1-1635682513496.png

 

 

    L
    LucMeekes23-Emerald IV
    23-Emerald IV
    November 1, 2021

    Mathcad with Maple:

    LucMeekes_0-1635753476770.png

     

    LucMeekes_1-1635753519162.png

    Luc

     

     

      W
      Werner_E25-Diamond I
      25-Diamond I
      November 1, 2021

      I had no doubt that Maple in MC11 would return the correct result without problems.

      Terms & ConditionsCookie settingsAccessibility statement