Skip to main content
J
JensN.1-Visitor
1-Visitor
January 20, 2014
Solved

[IM] "deferred relationship" between items possible?

  • January 20, 2014
  • 1 reply
  • 1631 views

Hi @all,

today some users came to me and asked me if following would be possible:

We have amongst others two itemtypes in our changemanagement: lib-request and package-request. The lib-request has a relationship-field, which can hold some of the package-requests. The idea was that user a could place a package-request into the relationship-field of the lib-request, but this should be some kind of deferred relationship, and user B has to confirm (or negotiate) this relationship. Is this possible (without a third request)?

Thanks, Jens

    Best answer by mrump

    Hi Jens,

    What about 2 relationship fields in the lib-request (like "proposed Relation" and "accepted Relation") and a kind of "staging/review" workflow?

    Only one of the Fields (proposed Relation) is editable by the users, the other one is read only (except for your scripting accound)

    Write a trigger script that copies the Relatiionship from one field to the other, in case the triggers run conditions are met (e.g. a State change to "confirmed")?

    HTH Matthias

    1 reply

    M
    mrump16-PearlAnswer
    16-Pearl
    January 21, 2014

    Hi Jens,

    What about 2 relationship fields in the lib-request (like "proposed Relation" and "accepted Relation") and a kind of "staging/review" workflow?

    Only one of the Fields (proposed Relation) is editable by the users, the other one is read only (except for your scripting accound)

    Write a trigger script that copies the Relatiionship from one field to the other, in case the triggers run conditions are met (e.g. a State change to "confirmed")?

    HTH Matthias

    J
    JensN.1-VisitorAuthor
    1-Visitor
    January 27, 2014

    Hi Matthias,

    thanks for your hint, this looks promising.

    kind regards, Jens

    Terms & ConditionsCookie settingsAccessibility statement