Skip to main content
1-Visitor
July 24, 2012
Solved

HEEEELP! How to edit an .igs file on PTC Creo?

  • July 24, 2012
  • 35 replies
  • 78421 views

Hello,

 

I am using PTC Creo Parametric 2.0 and I really need to edit an .igs file!

I can import it and open it but i cannot modify the geometry or like modify the original sketch...I am just able to move the parts.

 

What I need to do is to create another sketch over the geometry and the 3D I import, cause I need to draw and add another "piece" to it.

 

If anyone knows how to do it please reply!

 

Thanks in advance


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.
Best answer by joates

Thanks for all the feedback. This was my first ever post and I’ve had some helpful replied and support. All in all its been a good vent for some of my frustrations.. to be constructive on some of the irritations:

- suggestions/feedback...? I could not find an official sections/feedback e-mail or reply page.

- 2D control drawings dimensions: when it comes to dimensions it now takes 4 clicks plus mouse movements/hovering to move a dim around and into a non default position. rather than 2 and a bit of hovering.

This may sound like a small thing to get pissed off about, but it made my time to complete my end of project tasks/work twice as long! And its not like it was not good before... Time is money and I don’t like spending it on what should be old rope.

- Open system window > purge (working directory): Its very helpful to purge your working directories when you got big asms and many components. Stops your drive filling up quick. Only accessible through Creo 2.0 when NO files are open.

35 replies

1-Visitor
October 17, 2012

Hate it. this is the worst kind of crapware i have ever seen. It so bad, that im thinking about leaving a really good job, just to get out of it.

Parametrics dont regenerate stable

geometric constrainst fall apart

patterns, wont update. for no apparrent reason.

geometric constraints in skeches, redefine, move and create at will.

load/weights dont update correctly.

I cant use entered load data on purchased parts, to do anything.

The abuse of my poor arm. whoever makes this, have a click fettich. the amount of hand movement/cliking is at least double that of AD inventor.

Things fail, but the trafic light is still green.

WHEN the trafic light is red, the only way of locating the problem, is writing down the part name on a piece of paper, the using the find function to find the part.. WHY cant i just right click it, then find in tree, the function is there

No solutions to problems. Just workarounds. ( i feel like the dashboard in my car has lost all lighting, and im sitting in the car with a flashlight in my mouth. YES i can see the dash, no i dont like driving like that)

The borow licens feature broke. For no apperant reason. The fix, was an old one. But not implemented in the setup.

un intuitive menus

The unatended install doesnt work

Comming from inventor, now i have to get used to calculating between

some menues cant be activated by enter, or by midlle clicking. meaning MORE mouse work

The list just goes on and on and on.

one day a hole can be made with thread.. The next the same hole has to be redefined as a hole with cosmetic thread. The third day, i had to redo it, as an extrution, with a cosmetic thread..

I cant alter a hole, from a threaded, to a non threaded, without loosing my patterns.

No easy way to do any logic programming. In inventor, when something bothered me, i could do a macro. Here i can record a mapkey, to always do the same. Meaning, that if i want to do something to all part, i have to select them one by one, and THEN activate my mapkey.

Then theres the things that need a drawing to explain

Granted, the new menus, are better than the old ones... But the old ones are still here

In short.

i dont trust it, because things dont update.

i cant fix half of the problems, because the menues are old an undocumented.

i cant do a construction, and with a good feeling in my stomach say.. now its right. Because i dont know.

1-Visitor
October 17, 2012

Yeah, I have had the same feelings when I saw Autodesk Inventor 2012 Professional for the first time.

Creo Parametric is not worse - it is different.

You'll like it, I'm sure.

1-Visitor
October 17, 2012

hmm, they do say its a love/hate relationchip.

crapo instead of creo ?

right now im at the hate stage.

Unfortunatly i have, as yet, found 3 things i like.

The replace function, though the userinterface is crap, works like a charm.

The way you can change a pattern, to be table driven is nice. Again, not easy to find, or understand how to use. Still a nice feature.

the way it rotates using the middle button is cool.

Thats it for my experience.

i even forgot to mention the single most commen reason for problems, not related to the software itself being crap.

The way, that config.pro files work.

1. Read in program dir.

2. Read in current dir.

3. Read in user dir.

When you save youre settings they will overwrite 2, with ALL youre options.

Next time you open, 3, will overwrite the last settings.

AND as we use them.

1. Program settings / try to fix most of the crap.

2. Seach paths, for this project.

3. custom user mapkeys, collors and so on.

So basicly, every now and again the support f**cs up, the config pro structure, and nothing works again

1-Visitor
October 18, 2012

Having read all these fine comments, I sense a bit of frustration with Creo

I've been working with Pro/E since 1999. Came from a company that was using Unigraphics back then.

It was a HUGE step backwards.

Over the years I came to understand Pro/Engineer and really like the way it works. Though I'm still missing some of the functions from the old Unigraphics.

Windchill was added along the way and new problems arrived.

2½ years ago I joined a company which had moved from Inventor to WF5 due to a corporate decision.

NO happy workers there. Windchill was f...everything up, and people were generally frustrated.

It took more than a year to correct Windchill 9.1M030 behaviour and make people accustomed to WF5. They're not happy with it, but can their day to day work without too much hassle.

Now we've moved to Windchill 10 and a much better UI. Still problems, but we're working on them.

My point here is: Why do I have to spend so much time on making things right and teaching basic CAD stuff to experienced Inventor users?

I want to do engineering in WF5/Creo and not spend so much time on system administration.

PS - I think Creo 2 is a huge step forward, but see BIG problems ahead when we change from WF5 to Creo 2.0 (again corporate decision).

1-Visitor
October 18, 2012

Well we have i guy, going from pro -> solidworks.

its like having a baby again.

Basicly i think there are different filosophies (sorry for my spelling) behind.

That aside, im not asking it to do anything fancy.

Most of what i do, comes straight from the basic course.

not using Windchill, but having used AD vault, i know what can happen, if folks just dont get how the system works.

The problems we have with crapo.....

i call support so often, that friday at noon, the call me, to ask if im alive, if i havent called this week.

i want to do my job.

Not do it again and again and again.

Basicly, i want the computer to make drawings, me to define models, and think of as little as i can along the way.

i DO want to thank people here.

I did get a couple of tips already.

Hope there will be more

1-Visitor
October 18, 2012

ohh yes.. forgot this.

anyone know, how to get the trail files, to work reliably.

Heres the setup.

I create a shortcut, calling a trail file.

This opens my main assy. And "hey", im working.

now, when i borrow a license, taking it home.

Working at night, instead of talking to the misses, to make my quota, trying to make up the time lost "working" in crapo along the day.

next day, when i arrive at work, Crapo tells me, it has returned the license.

And thats where we stop.

Now in inv. i would have known, how to tell it to press ok, and get on with it.

in crapo, i can make either a trail file, pressing ok.

or a trail file not pressing.

can it do it by itself ?

1-Visitor
January 17, 2013

Ok Just found another, you just can mean its like this.

I made a pattern of som threaded holes.

Then i made som more features on the thing.

Then i desided the bolts have to go through from the other side.

So then i wanted to change my hole pattern, from threaded, to through hole.

No can do.

i just HATE this crapware

1-Visitor
January 17, 2013

I definitely understand this feeling.

This program just keeps proving to me over and over that it is the most stress-inducing piece of CAD garbage ever conceived.

The measurement tool seems to have a mind of its own today.

1-Visitor
March 1, 2013

I am reluctantly using Creo Elements / Direct Modeling with my current job. They hired several of us, and we are all attending a Creo class, taught remotely online. My employer is huge, and I was told my an engineer here that they will NEVER switch from Creo to any other CAD system, because of how Creo interfaces with the ERP/MRP system. This engineer tried several years ago to point out the cost-saving (time-saving) advantages of SolidWorks, but to no avail. Upper management simply closes their ears and eyes.

As I take notes in class, I make a note of all the limitations and frustrations in Creo compared to SolidWorks. SolidWorks is the most user friendly, intuitive CAD software I have ever used. My boss, optimistic and unaware of the management hard-liners, wanted me to make a spreadsheet comparing the two CAD packages. So far I have over 115 comparisons that prove SolidWorks far superior.

For example, you can't have a triangle or square around your notes text. The "Save As" command is incredibly complex, To trim a part, four of us took 30 minutes collectively to try to figure that out, etc. It's really a poorly written, user UNfriendly program. If anyone wants a copy of my spreadsheet, please let me know.

Patriot_1776
22-Sapphire II
March 1, 2013

I hate the creo GUI with a passion, ESPECIALLY the ribbon (see my other posts), but I will tell you SW doesn't hold a candle to Pro/E when it comes to geometry creation. They just NOW got conics? We had 'em in '95 (v15)or earlier. Top-down design in Pro/E is also much better. And, honestly, having used both, I liked the Pro/E interface (pre WF, and especially pre-creo) better and for me it was easier.

For a box around a line of text, start it with: @[ If you want a box around a bunch of text, or a triangle, create a symbol. It's not that hard.

When you can create in SW the shapes I can in Pro/E (see my album), then come tell me SW is better.

1-Visitor
March 1, 2013

Thanks, guys. Yes, I am super confused on all the PTC Products and why they don't completely change the names. For example, when you launch Creo Elements / Direct Modeling, the name CoCreate still appears during launch. Also, when you hover over the icon on your taskbar, it's CoCreate. Also, the ACTIVE forum (http://www.cocreateusers.org/forum/) is named CoCreate. WIth all the confusion about the names, I was not surprised that Creo 2 might be another name for CoCreate or even Pro/E. It just seems like the entire company is sloppy. SolidWorks has a very active and useful discussion forum. CoCreate only has 3 pages of user groups; SolidWorks has dozens, and a very active user group community. I'm disappointed in the company and especially the software. But my employer uses it, and I love my job, so I can't complete. I think naming it PRO/Create is a GREAT idea! . I guess I'll migrate from here over to the CoCreate forum. Thanks again! @MandoAnne on Twitter, and I'm also on Linked In - Anne Yust.

1-Visitor
March 4, 2013

I just found a leftover, of the old menus.

I hate, the amount of helt included, i actually likes how it works, once i figured it out.

Now i cant say if it was a Pro-e or a WF menu, But it worked.. It did what i wanted( once i understood, what it did). It was simple, non userfriendly and fast.

in short. It got the job done, without any fuss.

Now i dont mind a learning curve. honestly i dont.

Theese kind of menus, means i can do my job, and stop fucking around, with a fancy interface, that makes as little sense, and doesnt work.

Can we PLEASE get rid of the boss of the gui department, and get someone in to ptc, that actually has to WORK with this piece of useless crap

10-Marble
March 4, 2013

I hate {insert any changes to any product in the history of mankind} Believe it or not the user base became irate many years ago when our phone network grew to a point that people were asked to memorize a special code in order to reach the party desired... called... a Phone Number. I said it before I will say it again .. .you don't have to like the changes, there are thousands of 24 year old engineers just out of college without work that will be more than glad to impress you with their skills. Funny how I have never heard any of these engineers complain about the interface. Bottom line as we get older and set in our ways... we look as change as an obstacle instead of embracing it....

1-Visitor
March 4, 2013

Your probably right.

any change, will be of the bad kind.

I just cant understand, why this software dosnt feel, like the developers are actualy forced to use it.

My Xp with inventor, is, that as time goes by, more and more of my own macro developments are either coming up as internal command, because other people also see the use. Or there will be an even better way to do the same.

Asking tech support, about feature request, bug fixes and so on.

The answer ???

"Nope.

We have requested this 50 times, over the last 10 years.

Either not working, by design ( even though the manual states otherwise) or not going to be fixed."

My take on Poor-e / crappo.

Just there to milk the money, not to make it better

10-Marble
March 5, 2013

Jeremy

I can understand the frustration going from WF5 to Creo 2, it is a big step and takes some time to get use to it.

Personally, I found WF5 a big problem, as I work with the manufacting side, they had screwed the new interface, disabled the old system, which can be turned back on via a hidden option " enable_classic_nc_steps", this one is so hidden, the support guys didn't even know about it,i had to scream down the phone line before PTC hand it over.

with Creo 2 they have made an attempt to fix a lot of the bugs that was in Creo 1, you really would be upset if you had Creo 1.

we always keep upto date with each new release, this helps when making big steps from an old version . I am the office lab rat, I usually switch over around november to any new version, and spend till january sorting it out, before the rest of the office swtich over at the end of january, that way we can avoid mass confusion as someone in the office can assist.

Hints and tips

1. create your own custom ribbon with all the commands you need on one ribbon make it more like WF5 if you want, it need to save the creo_parametric_customization.ui in the following location

C:\Users\lyonsp\AppData\Roaming\PTC\ProENGINEER\Wildfire\.wf\.Settings

yes it is store in wildfire setting folder, not creo ?????

make sure the option" load_ui_customization_run_dir" is set to" NO "in your config.pro

with the two thing above set, you will have the same ribbon every time.

2. PURGE COMMAND

with the internal structure changed in Creo, it handles external programs differently, the following is an extracte from our PTC support for how to set the purge command

Dear Peter,

Regarding the issue of purge command, could you please test these things

  1. Set an environment variable called PATH to bin folder (example C:\PTC\Creo 2.0\Parametric\bin)

  1. Set config.pro option terminal_command to C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe

  1. Ensure purge.exe file is available at C:\PTC\Creo 2.0\Common Files\M030\x86e_win64\obj

  1. PTC installation folders should have write permissions

Please let us know if it fixes

environment variable are set via the control panel, if there is a path set already for other programs, add the PTC path for the location of the PURGE command on the end. The main ones to set is the PATH and the config.pro option for terminal.

3. MAPKEYS

Again our support informed us that the structure of mapkeys has changed, a lot of the pre set mapkeys are gone, and basically we had to reset all our mapkeys.

4. The system information window is a very helpful tool to use, to find out what license you are running, what optional modules are loaded, and the load paths for all the setting files, it is located on the file\help

system+info.JPG

system+2.JPG

system+help+3.JPG

Nobody likes change, but our view here is if we keep the update process current to the latest release, the steps will be only small ones.

And one passing thought......

I have been told that PTC is in the transtion phase with creo , from the old software direction, to where they want the new software to be in 2016, and that they are doing this in 5 steps ( Creo 1 to 5 ), I would recommend that everyone try to keep up to date with the latest version.

Peter

Patriot_1776
22-Sapphire II
March 5, 2013

Thanks for the info Peter.

If this is any indication of the direction they're heading, I cringe......

10-Marble
March 5, 2013

Hi 

 

No...., PTC is keeping their cards close to their chest, and that the scary part.

 

I have a munafacturing system of over 7000 files, all in the old turning interface.

 

We have asked for a firm commitment for compatablity after Creo 5, can't get an answer.

 

As myself and my second have now seen how Creo is handling the old manufacturing files, some file just don't function, conflicts with parameters, and the lack of direction from PTC on this issue, we are more than convinced that at some stage in the future, support for old interface will be disabled permanetly.

 

This leaves us with the update or not to update question, and our companies directive is to keep up to date with our software, so I am now tying to redo as many files as possible in the new interface.

 

PTC is being very secertive in the direction, when we recieved WF5 we was told WF6 was coming, then the bomb shell, scrapping the wf platform and releasing Creo all within 12 months, they knew this was going to happen, they didn't just wake up one morning and say, lets just change everything just for the sake of it.

 

This is a long term business stratergy.

 

While I can understand the reasons why they have to do that and why the need for them to not show their hand because of the competition.., but they need to understand that we need direction and guidance so we can develop our business to suit the software direction, we are their customers...not their unpaid R & D team.

 

Peter

1-Visitor
March 6, 2013

Our hate for Creo isn't about adapting to change. Like the comment about the steering wheel and the brake being in the right place in a car (don't change it!), that's the point! Another example. Suppose you get a new job, and instead of using MS Excel, your new employer uses Fly-By-Night Spreadsheets. You get used to it, sure - it's CHANGE, after all. Any college student would be happy to use a spreadsheet that doesn't sort, doesn't use formulas, doesn't allow text in the cells - only numbers - SURE! What fun! They need a job, so it's NO PROBLEM. They ask, "what's wrong with the old geezers who miss the sort command - EMBRACE CHANGE!"

This is NOT about change. It's about programmers writing software that functions well, like SolidWorks. It's about a company with excellent customer service (SolidWorks), a company who LISTENS to user input about improvements to software and interface, a company with a huge and supportive user group community (again, SolidWorks). PTC is not even in the ring.

For anyone who wants a copy of my spreadsheet comparing 142 items between Creo and SolidWorks, please provide your name and email address.

1-Visitor
March 6, 2013

Hi,

I'd like a copy of your spreadsheet.

Preben Reventlow - preben.stougaard.reventlow@systemair.dk

Starting in a new job next month, working in SolidWorks and Siemens NX.

Keeping my place here in the community in case I return to "Creppo"

1-Visitor
March 6, 2013

Does anyone have the tldr version?

1-Visitor
May 8, 2013

We made the move about 2 months ago now...I think it is complete JUNK!!! In two months I've found maybe 4 features I like better and everything else takes 2-3X the steps to do something, or doesn't do it at all. If it was up to me, we would go back to Wildfire, or change to Solid Works.

1-Visitor
May 10, 2013

Yup.

We got the same responce, from our WF Users.

They shouldnt have changed the WF to Creo, They should have changed it from WF to WTF !!!.

Sorry for the bad jokes, This crappo software, is so bad, that only humor remains.

I want, solid edge, Inventor, Solid works, NX... Hell ill even go to 2d if that would get creo of my computers

15-Moonstone
May 10, 2013

Hi

Could you explain why they shouldnt have changed the WF to Creo