Skip to main content
1-Visitor
July 18, 2013
Question

Too frequent corruption of optimization analyses AND model!

  • July 18, 2013
  • 1 reply
  • 1657 views

Been using Simulate hard for 2 years now. Have gotten a lot of very complex and useful analyses from Simulate BUT I have also paid a dear price since upgrading to Creo 1.0. My models corrupt and become completely unusable with no forewarning and no recourse. This happens only with optimization analyses... normal analyses are unaffected.

Last night had an optimization run successfully ONCE... then when I went to edit it all rows in the "Design Limits" field were gone. Spent ours trying reconstruction and other workarounds. Nothing brings the model back to life.

I know at least one other very experienced user that says this happens too often. This has happened often enough that I am actually "on-the-fence" as to whether companies should use simulate for optimization. It's "bad business" to put hours into creating a model knowing that at anytime the model can become completely worthless. What's the incentive to re-creating it when it can (and will) happen all over again.


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.

1 reply

1-Visitor
July 18, 2013

Hi Chauncey,

Could you please file a case with Technical Support if you have not already done so (if you have, could you let me know the case id ?).

I'm guessing such corruption may point to an issue with the names of your measures, parameters or dimensions. Could you post an image of your Optimization Study Definition dialog before you run the study (with the name columns expanded to show the full names) ? Also please let me know which build you are running.

Thanks,

Steve.

cwenner1-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
July 18, 2013

Case # 11507002.

Nothing remarkable about parameter names (caps, underscores, numbers).

I am more creative with measure names though, do you really think that could create problems? I'm thinking "if it lets me create them then they must be okay, right?".

Measures use caps, lower-case, numbers, underscores and hyphens.

1-Visitor
July 18, 2013

Right, these names should not be a problem.

I can't run A130717_1856_OPT2 because some of the shells are not part of the 2D model definition. Made a number of edits to resolve this, but didn't reproduce the problem. Could you please upload a version of the model that runs and causes the problem, in its state before the run ?

Thanks,

Steve.