Skip to main content
R
RJ_141682886-Contributor
6-Contributor
July 13, 2026
Question

Absence of Test Cycle Management

  • July 13, 2026
  • 3 replies
  • 68 views

Unlike industry-standard tools such as HP ALM and Jama Connect, Codebeamer lacks a dedicated Test Cycle feature, limiting structured test execution planning

    3 replies

    Glenda_SAI
    Glenda_SAI7-Bedrock
    7-Bedrock
    July 14, 2026

    Hi!

    I want to understand your post a little better. Can you help me understand what your testing process is? I believe there is a way to create similar functionality, but we can work together to better ensure an optimal solution if I understand what your goals are.

      R
      RJ_141682886-ContributorAuthor
      6-Contributor
      July 16, 2026

      Testing Process - 

      Requirements → Test Cases → Test Set → Approval → Test Run → Assign Testers → Execute Tests → Record Results → Assignee Reporting → Summary → Failed Tests? → Re-Run Failed Tests → Merge Results → Final Test Set Report → Traceability Report → Closure

       

        Glenda_SAI
        Glenda_SAI7-Bedrock
        7-Bedrock
        July 16, 2026

        Thanks for sharing. I think what you’re looking for is a way to document the methodology for the tests to be conducted in, and group the test cases together, does that sound about right?

        Out of curiosity, is there a specific reason why you would only re-run failed tests?  This seems interesting. I would want to know if my modifications invalidated the previous tests.

        There’s more information on the test management for CB 3.2 [HERE]

        Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement