Lots of responses already and many people say "yes, they're getting spam (as a result)" and many say "no spam from this list". I hate results like that 🙂
We'll see how it goes. As I said, up until I signed up, I rec'd literally ZERO spam each day.
Regards Hall
rseys@mico.com To: - 05/06/2004 08:55 cc: AM Subject: Re: [model] New list member -- getting lots of SPAM
My company does not have a spam filter. Since I began posting on the Exploder, I have been inundated with spam. With every post I make it seems the spam increases in fervor. It is a great inconvenience, but something I have just accepted as one of the costs of using the Exploder service. The first few minutes of every day are spent deleting around 50-80 junk e-mails. During the working day, at least half of my e-mails are spam.
Randy Seys MICO, Inc. North Mankato, MN rseys@mico.com
-
Sent by: To: "PTC/USER Model Discussion" <-> bounce-model-109359@lists. cc:
ptcuser.org Subject: [model] New list member -- getting lots of SPAM
05/06/2004 07:36 AM
Please respond to
DStevenson
Guess I have to make this 1st line different.... How's that ??
I thought I would chime in here. I'm not sure why you would receive spam, but it wouldn't have come from the ptcuser.org site. Our lists are confidential and we don't sell, rent or otherwise distribute e-mail addresses. Unless someone happened to break into our system, it wouldn't be possible to get it from our server.
However, once you do post, your mail goes out to potentially thousands of other people, all receiving your e-mail address. Depending on what happens there, it is very possible that a spambot is out there harvesting your address. Don't forget also that anyone who gets a virus these days could inadvertently send your e-mail address to places you don't expect. How many of you have seen your e-mail address "spoofed" by a virus that someone else sent when there system got infected? I've had that happen many times, in fact, everytime there is a new major infection on the 'net.
I've looked at some alternatives such as a bulletin board system as opposed to an exploder, but that would cut off a lot of folks that don't have web access at work. (Some bulletin board let you read messages via e-mail but I haven't seen one that lets you post messages via e-mail to a bulletin board.) The other alternative would be to anonymize all contributions (strip the e-mail address) but that would mean you could not get direct replies from respondents, and that every reply to a posting would have to necessarily go to the entire list. A lot of people don't like that since the "netiquette" is to have the originator post a summary of all responses instead of getting 10-15 responses on the exploder.
A while back, I stripped out all of the e-mail addresses wherever I found them in the old archives...these are the files going back several years on the exploder. That should have stopped any potential harvesting from that source. The new system requires a login to access the e-mail lists...this is normally beyond the capabilities of the address harvesting software out there so it should prevent problems there.
My own address probably receives the most circulation due to the number of posts I make, but I don't believe most of the spam I get is from the list. I don't know how but I have other e-mail addresses (non work-related) that have never been used with this list or any other, and somehow the address still ended up on a spammer list. Go figure.
The best solution is to have a good spam filter on your e-mail client, preferably something that puts all filtered messages into a folder you can access to periodically check for e-mail that was improperly flagged as junk. Some corporate spam filters are way too aggressive that they throw out the baby with the bath water and you end up losing a lot of important mail (and they don't bother to tell you that the mail was bounced or deleted either).
I think you need to ask your IT department if anything changed on your companies end as far as the type of firewall? I used to get tons of spam until our company upgraded to a different firewall. I don't think the PTCUSER has anything to do with it this is a non-profit organization. Chris