Skip to main content
1-Visitor
August 15, 2017
Solved

Bug in symbolic integration?

I try to get formula for ellipse area in polar coordinates. I've got it but symbolic result is wrong. I can`t understand why?

Symbolic Area is zero.GIF

One more example with strange behaviour

Symbolic integration bug-2.GIF

 

Werner_E
Werner_EAnswer
25-Diamond I
August 16, 2017

The Mupad version licensed by PTC for Mathcad seems to be very old and also quite limited in functionality (compared to whats possible in Matlab).

14 replies

23-Emerald V
August 16, 2017

No, I'd rather think it's a bug in your formulation of the integral. Why additionally integrate from 0 to 1?

Ellipse.png

Translate
ifomenko1-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
August 16, 2017

Symbolic Area is zero (answer).GIF

Translate
23-Emerald V
August 16, 2017

Check my attachment (I've attached the file to my first reply), and see where a difference (if any) occurs.

 

Success!
Luc

Translate
Werner_E
25-Diamond I
August 16, 2017

Before evaluting the definite integral, Mathcads symbolics calculates the indefinite one and I guess that the problem lies here.

The expression MuPad calculates seems not to be valid for the full range of t (or its wrong completely?)

I guess that Lucs MC11 with Maple gives a different result

Bild.png

Translate
ifomenko1-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
August 16, 2017

And,so is this Achilles' heel?

Translate