Skip to main content
Werner_E
Werner_EAnswer
25-Diamond I
July 26, 2019

Simply don't use the symbolic evaluation after minerr

B.png

View in thread

23 replies

LucMeekes23-Emerald IV
23-Emerald IV
July 26, 2019

Here's an example of circuit analysis with Mathcad:LM_20190726_Circuit.png

(I generally first try to solve symbolically, afterwards I can fill in the numbers)

Success!
Luc

Translate
ssato15-MoonstoneAuthor
15-Moonstone
July 26, 2019

Hello Luc san

 

Thanks your quick response.

 

I can not solve  symbolically my problem.

 

I attached file.

Translate
LucMeekes23-Emerald IV
23-Emerald IV
July 26, 2019

Hello Ssato san,

 

I cannot read your file directly,

Please save as Mathcad 11 .mcd file and attach.

(do not care about any warnings when saving).

 

Luc

Translate
AlanStevens19-Tanzanite
19-Tanzanite
July 26, 2019

Because your initial equations are linear in the currents, I1, I2 and I3, they can be rearranged in matrix form and solved as in the attached  (I first manipulated the equations a little before putting them into matrix form).

 

Alan

 

Translate
ssato15-MoonstoneAuthor
15-Moonstone
July 28, 2019

Alan san

 

Thank you for your response.

I understood your method.

 

 

Translate
Werner_E
Werner_E25-Diamond IAnswer
25-Diamond I
July 26, 2019

Simply don't use the symbolic evaluation after minerr

B.png

Translate
ssato15-MoonstoneAuthor
15-Moonstone
July 28, 2019

Hello Werner-E san

 

Thank you for your response.

 

What is it?....

 It was a rudimentary mistake.

 
Translate
-MFra-21-Topaz II
21-Topaz II
July 28, 2019

Hi ssato,

Using the "direct network inspection" method. In my previous analysis, there was a mistake (I forgot to calculate a parallel) that now I've corrected.  (I renamed the passive and reactive components but the values correspond), and using the Minerr function in the solution block, I obtained these results :

network 222.jpgnetwork 223.jpgnetwork 224.jpgResults 1.jpgResults 2.jpg

 

Translate
    ssato15-MoonstoneAuthor
    15-Moonstone
    July 29, 2019

    Hello Topaz san

     

    Thank you for your response.

     

    Topaz
    Translate
    -MFra-21-Topaz II
    21-Topaz II
    July 29, 2019

    Hi ssato,

    you will find the complete xmcd worksheet in my previous post.

    Results 1.jpg

    Results 2.jpg

    It was fun. Many greetings, Francesco

    Translate
    ssato15-MoonstoneAuthor
    15-Moonstone
    July 30, 2019

    Hello MFranc san

     

    I'm intersted in your post. You solve without cicuit equations.

    But it is difficult for me...

     

    Translate
    -MFra-21-Topaz II
    21-Topaz II
    July 30, 2019

    Hi Ssato,

    the one I applied, in fact, is one of the most used procedures for small passive or active electrical networks. The generalized Ohm's law V (s) = Z (s) I (s) is applied.

    Sincerely 

    Franc

    Translate
      Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement