E-Numbers in symbolic result

Valery,

I was aware of the effect which we get when using integers. This was the reason the symbolics was forced on purpose to decimals by writing 10.0, etc. The eval of the full integer expression shows that Mathcad is doing the right substitution (and the internal variable X508 makes sense) but somehow is not able to resubstitute the way I have done later in the file. Showing that E-variable does not make sense and should not been done. BTW, the expression ln(E...) in the denominator should be simply 1, then we would get at least the positive solution 1.151.

Its a bug in my opinion, as Mathcad should show all solution - its capable of finding the five roots (for _z) anyway as i have shown in my sheet and is able to take the log of those values. With "fully" I would expect Mathcad to add sort of k*pi to the imaginary parts. I was not expecting Mathcad to solve that fifth degree equation in exact mode.

Valery Ochkov wrote: and what is it X: Try please more - solve, fully!

???? Did you try it yourself? It doesn't get rid of those internal variables - on contrary!

Or am I missing your point?

AlanStevens wrote: I've no idea why the ln(Exxx) numbers appear, but dividing through by e^(-10x) or e^(-8x) allows the symbolic solver to find numerical solutions (though only one at a time): Alan

Funny effect. I stumbled upon this on trying to solve an equation similiar to the second one of yours a different way. The E-numbers should simply be Euler e, though.