Skip to main content
Best answer by Werner_E

You could use symbolic evaluation

Werner_E_1-1716813037042.png

But you can't evaluate the functions numerically because LambertW is a symbolic only function.

 

So you would have to resort to the numerics

Werner_E_4-1716813980842.png

 

 

 

 

 

1 reply

W
Werner_E25-Diamond IAnswer
25-Diamond I
May 27, 2024

You could use symbolic evaluation

Werner_E_1-1716813037042.png

But you can't evaluate the functions numerically because LambertW is a symbolic only function.

 

So you would have to resort to the numerics

Werner_E_4-1716813980842.png

 

 

 

 

 

    C
    Cornel19-TanzaniteAuthor
    19-Tanzanite
    May 27, 2024

    This is:
    Cornel_0-1716815856104.png


    Now, how to find this?

    Cornel_1-1716815974492.png

    And this:

    Cornel_3-1716816162196.png

     

    C
    Cornel19-TanzaniteAuthor
    19-Tanzanite
    May 27, 2024

    Do you have any idea why V2 and V3 should not depend also on t, like V1(t)? Initially I was expected/thought that also V2 and V3 should depend on t in the solve block like V1(t): V2(t), V3(t), but it seems that V2 and V3 in solve block should not put to depend on variable t like V1(t).

    This not work:

    Cornel_2-1716816537067.png

     

    I see that as you have posted firstly above works: this work

    Cornel_3-1716816607306.png

    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement