max( ) works and min( ) doesn't ?

Forum|Forum|9 years ago
January 8, 2017
3 replies
3391 views

Hello, Everyone.

From :

(1).PNG

So the question is : Is there a reason for : " max( ) works and min( ) doesn't " ?

Thanks in advance for your time and help.

Best Regards.

1_max(-)-works-&-min(-)-doesnt-xmcd.zip

Other

Best answer by Werner_E

Ah, I did not realize that it depends on the first item in the vector.

Anyway, that behaviour sure is not as it should be and we may call it a bug.

But I am not sure how I would like min or max to behave. Normally in Mathcad, whenever a calculation encounters a NaN, it returns NaN as result. So for consistency min and max should return NaN in the examples above. On the other hand I guess it would not do any harm and would be convenient if those functions would simply ignore the NaN's - just like my filterNaN workaround.

Based on your information we can provide another workaround by simply putting + or - infinity at the front. But both workarounds will only work for vectors and must be modified slightly differently for row and column vectors.

W

Werner_E

25-Diamond I

Both, max and min, work OK the same way. NaN simply is interpreted as zero.

You may use filterNaN to get what you expect:

A

AlanStevens

19-Tanzanite

min works as expected as long as the first item in the vector is not NaN. Also works ok if the first item is NaN and the minimum is less than zero.

max has the same problem if all the terms, other than NaN, are negative.

Alan

W

Werner_E

Answer

25-Diamond I

Ah, I did not realize that it depends on the first item in the vector.

Anyway, that behaviour sure is not as it should be and we may call it a bug.

But I am not sure how I would like min or max to behave. Normally in Mathcad, whenever a calculation encounters a NaN, it returns NaN as result. So for consistency min and max should return NaN in the examples above. On the other hand I guess it would not do any harm and would be convenient if those functions would simply ignore the NaN's - just like my filterNaN workaround.

Based on your information we can provide another workaround by simply putting + or - infinity at the front. But both workarounds will only work for vectors and must be modified slightly differently for row and column vectors.

W

Werner_E

25-Diamond I

Based on Alans observation concerning the first item in a vector here are some Min/Max replacement with one and two arguments which ignore NaN's and also can be used vectorized.