Skip to main content

9 replies

19-Tanzanite
March 24, 2019

The numeric version seems to work ok (i.e. without the sudden flips) if formulated as in the attached.  It works because x3 is always greater than x1 and y3 is always less than y2.

 

Alan

 

Translate
24-Ruby IV
March 24, 2019

OK!

And what about the trace of the point 3?

 

And more! I do not know how to translate it into English:

Нет ничего практичней хорошей теории!

Нет ничего численней символьного решения задачи!

2-Circles-Face.gif

Translate
19-Tanzanite
March 24, 2019

I assumed you were only interested in getting point 3 to travel smoothly without the sudden large leaps. I’m unable to look at the trace aspect at present- I’ll take a look later.

 

Alan

 

PS I don’t know how to translate the Russian either!

 

Translate