Skip to main content
Best answer by Werner_E

You either follow up a thread with a more specific question and explain why your problem still seems not be solved (and provide additional information, maybe attach a worksheet if appropriate) or you highlight the best answer to ‘close’ the thread. However, “Close” here does not mean that no one can post any more answers—that is still possible. But the label signals to other participants that a satisfactory answer has already been provided (or that the questioner has given up :-) )

5 replies

W
Werner_E25-Diamond I
25-Diamond I
July 8, 2026

This really puts our clairvoyant abilities to the test! Without seeing the data in the argument vector R.c;cal, we can only assume that Prime is correct about the error message and that at least one element in the vector R.c;cal is not a scalar, but is itself a vector or even a string.

Maybe  R.c;cal is a nested vector like a 1x1 matrix consisting of a nx1 vector?

You must have a close look at the argument R.c;cal and find out, what its structure is and why its not a simple vector of scalars as it should be.

 

BTW, how about finally closing the many of your recent open threads?

 

Y
YA_1096379815-MoonstoneAuthor
15-Moonstone
July 8, 2026

Thanks for the answer 

I would look closely 

How to close the threads ? 

BTW I havn’t got the answer yet 

W
Werner_E25-Diamond IAnswer
25-Diamond I
July 8, 2026

You either follow up a thread with a more specific question and explain why your problem still seems not be solved (and provide additional information, maybe attach a worksheet if appropriate) or you highlight the best answer to ‘close’ the thread. However, “Close” here does not mean that no one can post any more answers—that is still possible. But the label signals to other participants that a satisfactory answer has already been provided (or that the questioner has given up :-) )

Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement