Skip to main content
Best answer by LucMeekes

This better?

LucMeekes_0-1596469020839.png

Mathcad 11, of course.

 

Luc

3 replies

V
24-Ruby IV
ValeryOchkov24-Ruby IV
24-Ruby IV
August 3, 2020

Mathcad ln

Mathematica log

L
LucMeekes23-Emerald IVAnswer
23-Emerald IV
August 3, 2020

This better?

LucMeekes_0-1596469020839.png

Mathcad 11, of course.

 

Luc

W
Werner_E25-Diamond I
25-Diamond I
August 3, 2020

As it looks neither MuPad (in MC15, 14), nor Maple (in MC 11, see Luc's answer) nor Primes new symbolic engine are able to give you the symbolic result which WA arrives at.

 

But you sure have found a bug in MuPad, as its symbolic and subsequently its numeric result 0.43239... is wrong.
Primes new symbolic, while in some respects even weaker than muPad, does not suffer from this bug.

Werner_E_0-1596478796006.png

 

BTW, the symbolic result given by MC11's Maple (see Luc's picture) is equivalent with the symbolic result of Primes new symbolic engine, given that

Werner_E_0-1596479212020.png 

and Primes new symbolic on the other hand is not able to do this simple simplification

Werner_E_1-1596479379335.png

 

 

    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement