Skip to main content
J
JamesBurcham1-Visitor
1-Visitor
August 27, 2013
Question

Creo 2.0 M070?

  • August 27, 2013
  • 8 replies
  • 3219 views

My company is currently running Creo 2.0 M040, I am considering updating us to M070, but I have been seeing some negative things on the forum about the updates. I would like to get the thoughts of a few people that have installed M070. What can I expect with the update? Is it worth updating at this point?


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.

8 replies

B
BillRyan16-Pearl
16-Pearl
October 1, 2013

James, I'd recommend getting a couple of the users to test it prior to pushing to production. There are two benefits for our company in the M070 build. One is a new config option where the preview window in the simplified rep UI only loads the images from objects in the WC10.1 workspace. (IE...it won't go to windchill and start automatically downloading objects into the users cache which can result in hangs) There is another benefit with the function of automatically locking objects in the workspace that was fixed. Sorry, I don't have much more detail on the lock issue. My perception from testing on large assemblies shows it to be more stable. On the downside, we are still not seeing performance improvements. I've got a couple cases and hoping to get to the bottom of it. I'm anticipating the answer to my case is that PTC recommends saving legacy version data to the new CP2 format. I'm also hoping for a strong focus on getting family tables to perform better. I've got data that shows assemblies will load twice as fast if the family table objects are converted to stand-alone objects.

R
RichardWisten1-Visitor
1-Visitor
October 2, 2013

Bill, we have noticed stability issues with the smart retrieval UI if the objects are forced to be streamed from the server. I have searched for but not been able to find the new config option for M070 that you mantioned. Do you remember what the option was or parts of it?

B
BillRyan16-Pearl
16-Pearl
October 2, 2013

Here is the config setting...

dm_preview_searches_server no

This setting will really benefit companies using Creo Parametric connected to Windchill with large structures using simplfied reps. We have a bunch of users using the pre-wildfire 5 simplified rep UI just to avoid the preview window. I've seen some very cool functionality in the preview that users will like. One thing you will want to verify with this setting is the RAM usage when the preview image populates. I opened an assembly pushing the RAM to 10.5GB (7.5GB in task manager XTOP). Upon going to the simp rep UI, the preview increased the RAM to 19.5GB. My 12GB RAM computer didn't like it...I went to our 32GB RAM computer to see the 19.5GB. A case has been opened for PTC to resolve...the SPR was generated yesterday!

    I
    Inoram14-Alexandrite
    14-Alexandrite
    October 2, 2013

    I don't use Windchill, but just for basic stablity I have been switching back and forth between M050 and M070 and they are probably similar. I never ran M040. Out of M050, M060, and M070 50 felt the most stable but they all crashed at some point, but not repeatable. But saying that, I just loaded 70 on new computer because I didn't have repeatable show stopper crashes.

    J
    JamesBurcham1-VisitorAuthor
    1-Visitor
    October 2, 2013

    Well every version of Proe/Creo seems to have crashing issues. So I wouldn't say crashing issues is anything new, unless there are increasingly more crashing issues.

    A
    AndyHermanson14-Alexandrite
    14-Alexandrite
    October 2, 2013

    Reading the exploders the last month sure makes it sound like M070 is worse then most. M080 is out this month. We will be looking at that for compatibility for the upcoming PDMLink 10.2 update in Feb. timeframe. Maybe M090 if the pieces fall into place.

    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement