Hi
One suggestion I have is to write a service that loops through the second infotable (as discussed in your scenario) and then compares that row with each row in the first infotable and if the name property in both match then update the boolean property of the first. A rough example of this code would be:
///// infoTable A being your first infotable property and B your second
var TableDuplicate = me.InfoTableA;
var tableLength = TableDuplicate.rows.length;
for (var x=0; x < tableLength; x++) {
var row = TableDuplicate.rows[x];
row.IsSelected = false;
}
var tableLength = me.InfoTableB.rows.length;
for (var x=0; x < tableLength; x++) {
var rowx = me.InfoTableB.rows[x];
var tableLengthy = TableDuplicate.rows.length;
for (var y=0; y < tableLengthy; y++) {
var rowy = TableDuplicate.rows[y];
if(rowx.Name == rowy.Name){
rowx.IsSelected == true;
}
}
}
me.InfoTableA = TableDuplicate;
If you look at the script, you will see I have made a duplicate of the first infotable and set all the boolean properties to false. This is to prevent unnecessary logging of the infotable property as each boolean property being set to true will cause a property log. I initially set all the boolean properties to false to make sure that only the current second infotable names have their boolean properties set to true in the first infotable. I finally then set the first infotable property to be the manipulated infotable property.
Hope that helps