Skip to main content
11-Garnet
January 2, 2025
Question

CN890869 seems to be stuck in release

  • January 2, 2025
  • 3 replies
  • 597 views
I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.0.0

CN890869 seems to be stuck in release at Release Changeables in Philips Change Notice Workflow with null pointer exception.

Here are the errors that I faced
wt.util.WTException: wt.lifecycle.LifeCycleException: wt.util.WTException: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "true"
Nested exception is: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "true"
Nested exception is: wt.util.WTException: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "true"
Nested exception is: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "true"
Nested exception is: wt.lifecycle.LifeCycleException: wt.util.WTException: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "true"
Nested exception is: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "true"
Nested exception is: wt.util.WTException: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "true"

    3 replies

    16-Pearl
    January 2, 2025

    Hi,

    Seems to me that it was unable to find the LC state to release the object.

    Very quick observation.

    Enable MS verbatim to deep dive. You may get clues.

    Cheers

    Hari

    avillanueva
    23-Emerald I
    23-Emerald I
    January 2, 2025

    Has this been working before or was there a recent change done? Is this a PTC supplied workflow expression code or your own customization. Are you able to post more information? Cause should be relatively simple to diagnose.

    18-Opal
    January 2, 2025

    @pplmoperations 

    From what you’ve posted it’s impossible to say exactly where the problem is in your code, you need to actually post the code for anyone to do that.

     

    That said, somewhere you are passing the String “true” where a number is expected, thus the format exception.

    Fix that and the LifeCycle exception might also be fixed. But again without seeing the code it’s impossible to say.

     

    Word to the wise, if you want people to help you include all the info (your code, MS and/or BGMS logs, etc). Getting into a back and forth with questions and answers is, well, you know, let’s just say inefficient. There’s a euphemism for you 😁

    HelesicPetr
    22-Sapphire II
    22-Sapphire II
    January 3, 2025

    @d_graham your words should be sculpted to the stone 😄

    PetrH