Intralink 10.0: Name vs Filename vs Number
No, this isn't the expected question of, "What is the difference between Name vs Filename vs Number." (Collective sigh of relief is heard from all. <g>)
But rather, this is a question about how Windchill/Intralink 10.0 "thinks" and how everyone out there assimilates to Windchill's "thinking."
In the couple of months that we've had WC/Intralink 10.0 up and running here, I've noticed that pretty much every table in WC has a column which lists an object's Name. But frequently there is not a column for theobject's Number. And there is rarely a column for the object's Filename.
That leads me to believe that WC/Intralink 10.0 generally "thinks" of an object with respect to the object's Name.
That is Question #1: Do all you 'chillers out there agree that WC/Intralink 10.0 gives primary attention to an object's Name and that Filename and Number are virtually second-class properties?
Which leads to Question #2: How do you and your users accommodate WC's mindset when it comes to Name being the primary object identification shown to the end user?
Why the question? Because in the world of digital files -- since the earliest days ofDOS --users have always searched for files based on Filename. It is the natural instinct of users.
But now in WC, with Filename often not listed in a table, the user can not rely on Filename for a quick identification of the file he/she is looking for within a folder. Instead of Filename, the user is generally presented with Name.
Since Filename and Name are not required to match..., and since Number will never match Filename once the file has been renamed (i.e. Number is unchangeable after initially created)..., then Name seems to be identifier that users should pay attention to.
So Question #2 also begs the question of, "Do you emphasize to users that they should live and die by Name instead of Filename? (And to essentially ignore Number?)"
Thanks for the feedback. I expect the responses to be interesting.

