Skip to main content
E
EmmettT7-Bedrock
7-Bedrock
September 1, 2023
Solved

Supported method to rename JNDI Adapter

  • September 1, 2023
  • 2 replies
  • 1819 views

If you happen to create a JNDI adapter that references the hostname and at some stage upgrade Windchill, the hostname is migrated to the new system. That can cause confusion as it may seem that the upgraded system is referencing the source, allowing cross-talk.

 

What is the supported method to rename the JNDI Adapter?

 

It would need to at least address the name in Info*Engine and the wt.federation.org.directoryServices property. This article asks the question, but does not answer it:
Article - CS361116 - Is it possible to change JNDI AD Adapter name or URL for the upgrading in Windchill 12.0 (ptc.com)

2 replies

avillanueva
23-Emerald I
avillanueva23-Emerald I
23-Emerald I
September 1, 2023

To prevent cross talk in the target system, I makes sure that any old hostnames are redirected on the target's hosts file to 127.0.0.1. Once upgraded, its fairly easy to edit on IEConf folder. In my case, I had a JNDI adapter for ActiveDirectory that was used for esignature. It was easy enough to not migrate this and recreate it via the UI after upgrade. 

E
EmmettT7-BedrockAuthor
7-Bedrock
September 1, 2023

How would you suggest to handle the disconnected participants if the adapter is rebuilt outside of the upgrade?

E
EmmettT7-BedrockAuthorAnswer
7-Bedrock
September 6, 2023

Looks like this might work...

Article - CS185660 - How to change the name of the custom JNDI Adapter in Windchill PDMLink (ptc.com)

    E
    EmmettT7-BedrockAuthor
    7-Bedrock
    October 12, 2023

    Some notes on this solution:

    • While renaming the JNDI Adapter, you need to not only rename Service Name and Runtime Service Name, but also all of the references in each of the properties for that adapter
    • For Windchill 12.1 and later, you do not need to execute the steps related to the configuration node because that is no longer in LDAP
    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement