Skip to main content
1-Visitor
February 17, 2016
Question

Family parts with combined views

  • February 17, 2016
  • 1 reply
  • 2119 views

I have a part with several standard combined views (we are using a MBD approach) and a derived part through a family table instance. The problem is that the combined views are not applied to the derived part and when I try to manually create them, I get an error saying that the name of the combined state is already in use. I know that I could simply assign unique names for each derived part but that would be confusing to those who need to interrogate the part down the road. Hopefully I'm missing something. We're using Creo 2 M070.


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.

1 reply

18-Opal
February 22, 2016

Hi Abraham,

I opened my generic model and opened the Task Manager.  I clicked on the All tab and created a few combined views.  I then opened my family table instance and opened the View Manager.

The combined views I created in the generic are still visible in the All tab of the instance.

Please tell me if you are doing the same, and not seeing the Combined Views in the instance, which were created in the generic?

Thanks,

Amit

1-Visitor
February 22, 2016

Yes, I've done the same process but on this particular part the combined views are not showing up. I think there is some sort of bug because when I save a copy of the generic part and then open the copy, then the combined views are being displayed correctly for all instances. Problem is that I don't know how to fix the original file.

18-Opal
February 22, 2016

Abraham,

The way to fix the original file is to file a SPR, and have PTC R&D fix it or you can use the model you copied from the original one, which seems to have fixed the issue.

Amit